Skip to content

· Public charity

First American Capital Corporation Inc

The mission of facc is to contribute to economic development in wisconsin indian country through facilitating access to capital in the form of business loans for american indian owned enterprises and through providing pre- and post-loan technical assistance.

$377k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$299k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$1.6MCommunity Improvement$781kHuman Services$70kHousing & Shelter$57kEmployment$8k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $364,042, the rows itemized in this filing. The $376,637 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $12,595 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $299k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAD RIVER HEALTH$299,042
HPG LLC$50,000
TOOTSIE'S TEA LLC$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ANASA TRAFFIC AND CONTROL SERVICES LLC: $88k → 5%MELTZ INDUSTRIES LLC: $125k → 7%NORTHLAND BUSINESS SERVICES LLC: $6k → 9%ARROWHEAD TRUCKING LLC: $70k → 9%DESTROY IRON FITNESS INC: $50k → 10%ABOUT TIME MOVING SYSTEMS LLC: $16k → 10%HILL FIX IT LLC: $20k → 10%PETROLEUM HEAT & POWER INC: $125k → 10%COUNTRY BOY DETAILING LLC: $24k → 11%D&D TRUCKING LLC: $8k → 11%REZ THREADS INC: $125k → 12%GREEN LEAF FARMS OF CHETEK LLC: $125k → 13%DAN BROWN TRUCKING LLC: $125k → 13%BAD RIVER HEALTH: $500k → 14%MJM TRUCKIN' LLC: $10k → 16%ALEX SIMPLY TRUCKING: $8k → 17%BOIVIN EXCAVATING LLC: $116k → 24%ALLEN REMODELING LLC: $38k → 5%ARROWHEAD TRUCKING LLC: $11k → 9%NATIVE PRIDE TRANSPORT LLC: $40k → 10%WISCONSIN NATIVE LOAN FUND: $57k → 10%REZ THREADS INC: $6k → 12%DANIEL BROWN TRUCKING LLC: $6k → 13%BAD RIVER HEALTH: $299k → 14%INTERGRATED TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS: $16k → 17%K DAWG & DICK TRUCKING LLC: $60k → 24%RJH TRUCKING LLC: $20k → 9%NATIVE PRIDE TRANSPORT: $8k → 10%HPG LLC: $50k → 10%NJK TRUCKING LLC: $45k → 17%NIIJII CAPITAL PARTNERS: $30k → 24%RJH TRUCKING: $8k → 9%SHAWN'S PRO WASH: $119k → 10%NJK TRUCKING LLC: $6k → 17%BOIVIN EXCAVATING LLC: $16k → 24%EAGLE FEATHER TRUCKING LLC: $7k → 10%TOOTSIE'S TEA LLC: $15k → 17%DIAMOND HVAC LLC: $125k → 10%RUTH'S NATIVE LANDSCAPING: $30k → 17%GO-GREEN PAINTING LLC: $23k → 10%MONTE ENTERPRISES LLC: $125k → 17%CHAMPIONSHIP WINDOW: $20k → 17%MOFOCO ENTERPRISES INC: $16k → 17%AMS GROUP LLC: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 21% of First American Capital Corporation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in WI; by stated purpose, 80%.

First American Capital Corporation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 8 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
29

Total granted

$1.5M
$1.4M

Still filing today

0%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BR
    BAD RIVER BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $799k
  • BE
    BOIVIN EXCAVATING LLC
    2× · 2020–2023 · $132k
  • RT
    REZ THREADS INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $131k

Funded once

  • GL
    GREEN LEAF FARMS OF CHETEK LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $125k
  • PH
    PETROLEUM HEAT & POWER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $125k
  • ME
    MONTE ENTERPRISES LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $125k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
2/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BAD RIVER BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS: $799,042 · OtherBAD RIVER BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANSBOIVIN EXCAVATING LLC: $131,747 · OtherREZ THREADS INC: $131,330 · OtherDAN BROWN TRUCKING LLC: $130,539 · OtherGREEN LEAF FARMS OF CHETEK LLC: $125,000 · OtherPETROLEUM HEAT & POWER INC: $125,000 · OtherMONTE ENTERPRISES LLC: $125,000 · OtherMELTZ INDUSTRIES LLC: $125,000 · OtherDIAMOND HVAC LLC: $125,000 · OtherSHAWN'S PRO WASH: $118,500 · OtherTOURTILLOTT FOREST PRODUCTS LLC: $113,500 · Other+26 more: $740,040 · Other+26 moreWISCONSIN NATIVE LOAN FUND INC: $56,857 · Housing & ShelterWOODLAND FINANCIAL PARTNERS: $30,361 · Community Improvement
Other$2,789,698Housing & Shelter$56,857Community Improvement$30,361

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWISCONSIN NATIVE LOAN FUND INC: $56,857 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetWOODLAND FINANCIAL PARTNERS: $30,361 over 1y, 8.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WISCONSIN NATIVE LOAN FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds WOODLAND FINANCIAL PARTNERS ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization First American Capital Corporation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from First American Capital Corporation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to First American Capital Corporation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to First American Capital Corporation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on First American Capital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph