How much did FINGER LAKES PERFORMING PROVIDER SYSTEM grant in FY2025?

FINGER LAKES PERFORMING PROVIDER SYSTEM reported 39 grants totaling $9,128,002 in its FY2025 IRS filing.

Where is FINGER LAKES PERFORMING PROVIDER SYSTEM based?

FINGER LAKES PERFORMING PROVIDER SYSTEM is based in NY.

FINGER LAKES PERFORMING PROVIDER SYSTEM

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

FINGER LAKES PERFORMING PROVIDER SYSTEM

Flpps is a new york state 501(c)(3) not-for-pofit organization with the mission to transform the healthcare delivery system by bridging the gap between community and healthcare.

$9.1M

Granted FY2025

Grants

Communities

$3.3M

Largest

01What you fund

0177% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.

Health$169MEducation$83MHuman Services$9.7MFood & Nutrition$1.5MCommunity Improvement$361kHousing & Shelter$69kCrime & Legal$32kEmployment$7kOther$78M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

implement dsripfinancial incentiveincentive implement

2020

implement dsripfinancial incentiveincentive implement

2021

implement dsripfinancial incentiveincentive implement

2022

implement dsripfinancial incentiveincentive implement

2023

financial incentiveincentive implement

2024

address barriersbarriers dischargedischarge complexcomplex patientseducationlivesdedicated

2025

educationfoodbabylivesaddress barriersbarriers dischargedischarge complex

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k2 grants · $15k
$10k–50k11 grants · $267k
$50k–250k20 grants · $2.0M
$250k+6 grants · $6.8M

$73,643

Median grant

States reached

$17M

Total assets

Largest grants

MONROE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$3,263,871
ARNOT HEALTH INC$1,711,904
CATHOLIC CHARITIES FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES$750,000
LWOERNER INC DBA HCR$487,683
GENESEE VALLEY PRESBYTERIAN NURSING CENTER$336,000
ROCHESTER REGIONAL HEALTH$270,274
ALLIANCE IPA LLC$192,000
EPISCOPAL CHURCH HOME$184,636
EXERCISE EXPRESS LLC$173,456
AARON MANOR REHAB & CONTINUING CARE$142,756
HURLBUT CARE COMMUNITIES$128,041
JEWISH HOME OF ROCHESTER$127,263
REFUGEES HELPING REFUGEES$120,318
CANISIUS UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO NEW YORK$108,947
ST JOSEPH'S NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER$86,250

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $9.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 87% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$339M · 176 repeat orgs$2.4M to everyone else

176 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 145 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

176

Total granted

$339M

$2.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%

+43%

Still filing today

61%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $258k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

RS
RU SYSTEM INC
8× · 2018–2025 · $97M · revenue +108% · 70% of their budget
U OF R MEDICAL CENTER SMH FINANCIAL SERVICES
6× · 2018–2023 · $83M · revenue +39%
FL
FINGER LAKES MIGRANT HEALTH PROJECT INC
7× · 2018–2024 · $15M · revenue +77% · 31% of their budget

Funded once

UA
URMC-HIGHLANDS AT BRIGHTON
one grant, 2023 · $432k
CM
CREST MANOR & EAST SIDE NURSING
one grant, 2024 · $272k
AH
ACCOUNTABLE HEALTH PARTNERS-IPA LLC
one grant, 2021 · $243k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Rochester General Health System

Rochester general health system, provides patient care, senior housing, laboratory services, and community outreach to residents and other clients in monroe county, new york and several surrounding counties.

Health

Seneca Health Services Inc

To be the leading provider of behavioral and physical healthcare through compassionate and quality services in our community.

—

Family Health Network of Central

Family health network of central new york, inc. operates free standing diagnostic and treatment centers, licensed under article 28 of new york state law, located in the counties of cortland and cayuga. the family health network of central…

Health

Home Health Services of Wjcs Inc

Home health services of wjcs is a ny state licensed home care service agency, hhs provides the highest quality services supporting older adults in aging in place while maintaining independence and preserving their dignity.

—

Leadingage New York Inc

Leadingage new york represents not-for-profit, mission-driven and public continuing care providers, including nursing homes, senior housing, adult care facilities, continuing care retirement communities, assisted living and community…

Civil Rights

Rochester General College of Health

The rochester general college of health careers is dedicated to preparing adult learners with the knowledge, skills, and competencies necessary to pursue health careers, advanced education, and lifelong learning.

Education

Rochester Management Inc

To provide clean, safe, well maintained, and affordable apartments and townhouses, suitable for anyone, in many locations throughout rochester, new york.

Housing & Shelter

Home Care Association of New York

To promote and enhance the quality and accesibility of health care and support at home.

Community Improvement

Hebrew Health Care Inc

Provision of exceptional health care & aging services tailored to each individual.

Health

Brightpoint Care Inc

Brightpoint care provides high quality care management services to individuals which drives dramatic improvements in the health of new yorkers.

—

Oswego Health Inc

The mission of Oswego Health, Inc. is to provide accessible quality care and improve the health of residents in our community.

Health

Tri-Cities Community Health

Deliver the highest quality health care to every person, every time.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Genesee Region Home Care Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hillside Children's Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 23. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.5%1/209

the rest of the field

804/11,768

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

129 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

124/129

Grantees still filing

102/129

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$169,045,530Education$82,943,503Other$78,056,899Human Services$9,681,626Food & Nutrition$1,541,312Community Improvement$361,177Housing & Shelter$68,630

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Rochester AndNY114.8× affinity62 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Rochester And · Rochester Area Community Foundation · Esl Charitable Foundation · Greater Rochester Health Foundation · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Max and Marian Farash Charitable · Rochester Female Charitable Society · Daisy Marquis Jones Foundation · Paychex Charitable Foundation Inc · Rochester Area Community Foundation · Community Foundation of Elmira-Corning · JM McDonald Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation FINGER LAKES PERFORMING PROVIDER SYSTEM funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: INTEGRITY PARTNERS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~91 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.5× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 821387997 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on INTEGRITY PARTNERS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 91 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 95% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Finger Lakes Performing Provider System?

Find your warmest path to Finger Lakes Performing Provider System through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

FINGER LAKES PERFORMING PROVIDER SYSTEM

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

129 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Finger Lakes Performing Provider System?

More from the funding graph

FINGER LAKES PERFORMING PROVIDER SYSTEM

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

129 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Finger Lakes Performing Provider System?

More from the funding graph