Skip to content
Film Society of Austin Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Film Society of Austin Inc

$201k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$1.7MCommunity Improvement$211kScience & Tech$168kFood & Nutrition$24kReligion$21kHuman Services$19kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $47k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$8,648
Median grant
2
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Newbie Films LLC$80,240
Four Pillars Films LLC$69,375
10th Street Films LLC$37,093
Family Band LLC$10,000
SPRATX$8,648
Andrew Morgan$7,955
Walker Film LLC$7,000
Sugarloaf Pictures LLC$6,498
Weekenders Media LLC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 20% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Newbie Films LLC: $80k → 14%Jumper Productions LLC: $111k → 10%Sugarloaf Pictures LLC (Andrew Richey): $122k → 10%Christian Vasquez: $13k → 14%Alexis Franco Architecture LLC: $19k → 16%Margaret Brown Productions LLC: $19k → 19%Laura Dunn Productions LLC: $19k → 14%TTJ LLC (Margaret Brown): $62k → 23%Found Piece Productions: $51k → 10%Laura Dunn Productions LLC: $19k → 14%Laura Dunn Productions LLC: $36k → 10%10th Street Films LLC (Heather Courtney): $46k → 14%10th Street Films LLC: $37k → 14%Raval PJ LLC: $73k → 10%Ashley Starling Thomas: $13k → 14%Heather Courtney: $28k → 14%Raval PJ LLC: $20k → 10%Breaking Silence LLC (Amy Bench): $19k → 10%Raval PJ LLC: $18k → 10%PJ Raval LLC: $15k → 10%PJ Raval LLC: $13k → 10%Galan Incorporated: $46k → 10%Four Pillars Films LLC: $95k → 10%Sparkle Motion Films LLC: $56k → 10%Four Pillars Films LLC: $69k → 10%Sparkle Motion Films LLC: $51k → 10%Four Pillars Films LLC: $29k → 10%Sparkle Motion Films LLC: $44k → 10%Mary Kathryn Robinson: $65k → 10%Mary Kathyrn Robinson: $42k → 10%Passage Productions: $15k → 10%Mary Kathryn Robinson: $13k → 10%Fin & Fur Films Productions LLC: $14k → 10%Anne Lewis: $13k → 10%Beef and Pie LLC: $24k → 10%Flying Goose LLC: $15k → 10%Berghaus Productions LLC: $14k → 10%Patrick Bresnan: $103k → 10%Glades Community Media Patnership LLC: $102k → 10%The Glades Community Media Partnership LLC: $84k → 10%Karen Kocher: $28k → 10%Tower Documentary LLC: $46k → 10%Price for Progress LLC: $20k → 10%Price for Progress LLC: $17k → 10%Chelsea Hernandez: $15k → 10%Price for Progress LLC: $15k → 10%Chelsea Hernandez: $12k → 10%When We Were Live LLC: $13k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 20 repeat orgs$719k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
29

Total granted

$1.6M
$600k

Still filing today

0%
3%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $119k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PB
    Patrick Bresnan
    3× · 2017–2019 · $289k
  • FP
    FOUR PILLARS FILMS LLC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $194k
  • PR
    PJ Raval LLC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $162k

Funded once

  • JP
    Jumper Productions LLC
    one grant, 2018 · $111k
  • TL
    TTJ LLC (Margaret Brown)
    one grant, 2023 · $62k
  • FP
    Found Piece Productions
    one grant, 2017 · $51k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
0/1
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Patrick Bresnan: $289,324 · OtherPatrick BresnanFOUR PILLARS FILMS LLC: $193,775 · OtherFOUR PILLARS FILMS LLCPJ Raval LLC: $161,812 · OtherPJ Raval LLCSparkle Motion Films LLC: $161,598 · OtherSparkle Motion Films LLCSugarloaf Pictures LLC (Andrew Richey): $128,140 · OtherSugarloaf Pictures LLC (Andrew Richey)Mary Kathryn Robinson: $119,094 · OtherJumper Productions LLC: $111,014 · Other10th Street Films LLC (Heather Courtney): $83,436 · OtherNewbie Films LLC: $80,240 · OtherPrice for Progress LLC: $79,216 · Other+44 more: $863,876 · Other+44 moreCOLOR ARC PRODUCTIONS: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,271,525Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Sundance Institute
Sundance InstituteUT13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sundance Institute

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Film Society of Austin Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Film Society of Austin Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY24–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Film Society of Austin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home