Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Fifth Manhattan Masonic District Association Endowment Fund Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$20k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$41kHealth$37kPhilanthropy$27kReligion$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kYouth Development$125Environment$3Other$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
1
States reached
$720k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PURPLE CIRCLE RELIEF FUND$5,000
CHILDRENS DYSLEXIA CENTER OF NYC$5,000
MASONIC MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$750
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$350
Individual grant recipient$250
Individual grant recipient$100
Individual grant recipient$100
Individual grant recipient$100
Individual grant recipient$100
Individual grant recipient$50
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 84% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MARIA ALEXANDRA BEAUDRY: $750 → 11%ALEXANDRA B WEBSTER: $750 → 14%TATIANA NEEDHAM: $2k → 6%MEGAN WILLIAMS: $2k → 7%ABIGAIL BARLOW: $500 → 10%DYLAN JAMES MORTON: $2k → 11%DAMICA E VILLANUEVA: $1k → 11%KENDALL BENAC: $750 → 12%ROBIN S SANTOS: $500 → 13%MADISON BUSCAGLAIA: $1k → 13%KAYLEE J PEREIRA: $1k → 14%LAUREN ELIZABETH WHRITNER: $1k → 15%MASONIC MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $5k → 16%ERIC SADOWSKI: $750 → 18%AVERY HUDGINS: $2k → 20%NOELLE KOURAKOS: $750 → 10%SETH WARRICK: $500 → 13%BENJAMIN LOUIS BOARDMAN: $500 → 17%MIKAYLA BERK: $1k → 6%JESSE MORTON: $750 → 11%MAX SEVOR: $500 → 14%PATRICK GEEHERN: $1k → 14%MASONIC MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $5k → 16%MASONIC BENEVOLENCE FOUNDATION: $20k → 17%FIFTH MANHATTAN PURPLE CIRCLE: $10k → 6%SAMANTHA ALOLOR: $2k → 13%SEAN O'CONNOR: $1k → 13%NICK ODLE: $2k → 14%SERENITY M CAPELLA: $1k → 14%MASONIC MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $5k → 16%CHANCELLOR LIVINGSTON MASONIC: $15k → 17%ALLISON JANE GIARIPPO: $750 → 13%MASONIC MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $4k → 16%CHILDRENS DYSLEXIA CENTER OF NYC: $5k → 17%PURPLE CIRCLE RELIEF FUND: $5k → 6%NICHOLAS BURGYNSKI: $2k → 13%MASONIC MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $4k → 16%ROBERT LIVINGSTON LIBRARY: $5k → 17%SOFIA I CHRISTOFIDES: $750 → 6%CHILDRENS DYSLEXIA CENTER OF NYC: $5k → 17%NICHOLAS CAMMMARATA: $1k → 6%MICALENA ARDITO: $750 → 7%CHILDRENS DYSLEXIA CENTER OF NYC: $5k → 17%FIFTH MANHATTAN PURPLE CIRCLE: $5k → 17%MASONIC BROTHERHOOD FUND: $5k → 17%FIFTH MANHATTAN PURPLE CIRCLE: $4k → 17%CHANCELLOR LIVINGSTON MASONIC: $4k → 17%FIFTH MANHATTAN PURPLE CIRCLE: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
VA
TN
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$77k · 5 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
70

Total granted

$77k
$63k

Still filing today

20%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MASONIC MEDICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
    5× · 2018–2024 · $22k · revenue +19%
  • FM
    FIFTH MANHATTAN PURPLE CIRCLE
    4× · 2017–2022 · $22k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2017–2018 · $19k

Funded once

  • MB
    MASONIC BENEVOLENCE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • MB
    MASONIC BROTHERHOOD FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • RL
    ROBERT LIVINGSTON LIBRARY
    one grant, 2023 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
1/1
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIFTH MANHATTAN PURPLE CIRCLE — $21,790 · OtherFIFTH MANHATTAN PURPLE CIRCLEMASONIC BENEVOLENCE FOUNDATION — $20,000 · OtherMASONIC BENEVOLENCE FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $18,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHILDRENS DYSLEXIA CENTER OF NYC — $15,000 · OtherCHILDRENS DYSLEXIA CENTER OF NYCPURPLE CIRCLE RELIEF FUND — $5,000 · OtherMASONIC BROTHERHOOD FUND — $5,000 · OtherROBERT LIVINGSTON LIBRARY — $5,000 · Other+79 more — $38,198 · Other+79 moreMASONIC MEDICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY — $22,000 · HealthMASONIC MEDICAL …
Other$128,488Health$22,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMASONIC MEDICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY — $22,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MASONIC MEDICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fifth Manhattan Masonic District Association Endowment Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fifth Manhattan Masonic District Association Endowment Fund Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Fifth Manhattan Masonic District Association Endowment Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph