Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Fifth Avenue Committee Inc

Fifth avenue committee's mission is to advance economic, social and racial justice in new york city through its comprehensive community development programs and projects.

$445k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$419k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Housing & Shelter$1.8MEmployment$453kCommunity Improvement$381kYouth Development$141kEnvironment$89kCrime & Legal$21k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $250k+1 grant · $419k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
551 WARREN STREET HDFC$418,895
NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS$20,000
NEW YORK HOUSING CONFERENCE$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $141k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%red hook initiative: $92k → 20%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $50k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.4M · 11 repeat orgs$437k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$2.4M
$12k

Still filing today

82%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $425k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $644k · revenue +121%
  • FR
    FAC RENAISSANCE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $432k · revenue +32%
  • LI
    LEAP INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $303k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • 5W
    551 WARREN STREET 1 LP
    one grant, 2020 · $12k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fifth Avenue Committee Inc

Fifth avenue committee's mission is to advance economic, social and racial justice in new york city through its comprehensive community development programs and projects.

2
The Real Estate Board of New York Inc

1. to unite in common organization those professionally engaged in real estate. 2. to protect and promote the mutual interests of its members. 3. to formulate and maintain ethical standards for the guidance of its members in their…

3
Brooklyn Housing Inc

To provide low income housing

4
Habitat for Humanity New York City and Westcherster County Inc

Habitat for humanity new york city and westchester county transforms lives and communities by building and preserving affordable homes with families in need, and by uniting all new yorkers around the cause of affordable housing.

Housing & Shelter
5
Central Brooklyn Economic Development Corp

Develop and provide affordable housing

Education
6
Preserving City Neighborhoods Housing Development Fund Corp

The corporation is organized exclusively for the purpose of perserving and creating, on a non-profit basis, housing projects for persons of low and moderate income. in addition to promoting affordable housing opportunities, it seeks to…

Housing & Shelter
7
Northeast Brooklyn Housing Develop

The Organization is commited to the preservation, development, and management of affordable housing and home ownership opportunities:community and economic development initiative and human services to effect social change in central…

Housing & Shelter
8
Pratt Area Community Council Inc

To promote affordable housing, community and economic development.

Housing & Shelter
9
A Better Way Brooklyn Inc

A better way brooklyn, inc. is a new york not-for-profit corporation formed for the purposes of educating the public about transportation issues throughout new york city by promoting community awareness and concerns on construction and…

Public Benefit
10
Neighborhood Renewal Housing Development Fund Corporation

The corporation is organized exclusively for the purpose of perserving and creating, on a non-profit basis, housing projects for persons of low and moderate income. in addition to promoting affordable housing opportunities, it seeks to…

Housing & Shelter
11
Hudson Yards Development Corporation

See schedule oto coordinate and facilitate the economic development of the hudson yards area of manhattan. this includes construction of an extension to the no. subway line, the coordination of the design and construction of certain public…

Community Improvement
12
Matinecock Court Housing Development Fund Corporation

To construct, operate, and maintain a low income housing development

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fac Advance Housing Development Fund Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Leap Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS INC — $643,973 · Housing & ShelterNEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS INCFAC RENAISSANCE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION — $432,000 · Housing & ShelterFAC RENAISSANCE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION551 WARREN STREET HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION — $418,895 · Housing & Shelter551 WARREN STREET HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATIONLEAP INC — $303,096 · Housing & ShelterLEAP INC129 23RD STREET HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION — $134,500 · Housing & Shelter129 23RD STREET HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATIONFAC PRESERVATION HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION — $96,000 · Housing & Shelter+2 more — $71,000 · Housing & ShelterFAC CENTER LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $256,166 · Community ImprovementFAC CENTER L…SOUTHWEST BROOKLYN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $63,049 · Community ImprovementSOUTHWEST BR…FAC 6309 FOURTH AVENUE LP — $200,000 · OtherFAC 6309 FO…SUNKEEPER SOLAR LLC — $88,500 · OtherSUNKEEPER S…551 WARREN STREET 1 LP — $11,834 · OtherRED HOOK INITIATIVE — $141,250 · Human Services
Housing & Shelter$2,099,464Community Improvement$319,215Other$300,334Human Services$141,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS INC — $643,973 over 9y, 12% of budgetFAC RENAISSANCE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION — $432,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetLEAP INC — $303,096 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetFAC CENTER LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $256,166 over 3y, 20% of budgetRED HOOK INITIATIVE — $141,250 over 2y, 2.3% of budget129 23RD STREET HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION — $134,500 over 3y, 55% of budgetFAC PRESERVATION HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION — $96,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetFAC ADVANCE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION — $65,000 over 3y, 8.6% of budgetSOUTHWEST BROOKLYN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $63,049 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetNEW YORK HOUSING CONFERENCE INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fifth Avenue Committee Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph