Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Missouri · Public charity

Festus-Crystal City Elks Lodge 1721

Charitable & fraternal

$132k
Granted FY2026(still arriving)
2
Itemized grants FY2026
2
Organizations funded FY2025
0%
First-time grantees FY2025
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2026
$21k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2026
$10,913
Largest grant, FY2026
$10,913
Organizations funded a year
2 to 3
FY2024 to FY2025
States reached, FY2026
1
Total assets, FY2026
$3.5M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2025, 0% of the organizations Festus-Crystal City Elks Lodge 1721 funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2026still arriving2$21k0%
FY20252$21k0%
FY20243$24kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Environment$21kAnimals$18kRecreation & Sports$7k

Top grantees

Largest grants in FY2026.

MO ELKS BENEVOLENT TRUST$10,913
ENF$9,989

Compare Festus-Crystal City Elks Lodge 1721 with peer funders

About Festus-Crystal City Elks Lodge 1721

How much does Festus-Crystal City Elks Lodge 1721 give?
Festus-Crystal City Elks Lodge 1721 reported 2 itemized grants totaling $20,902, out of $132,205 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2026 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 3 organizations a year over FY2024 to FY2025.
What does Festus-Crystal City Elks Lodge 1721 fund?
By grant dollars over FY2024 to FY2026, its largest causes are Environment (46%), Animals (39%), Recreation & Sports (15%).
Does Festus-Crystal City Elks Lodge 1721 fund new organizations?
In FY2025, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Festus-Crystal City Elks Lodge 1721 based?
Festus-Crystal City Elks Lodge 1721 is based in MO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Festus-Crystal City Elks Lodge 1721’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home