Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Fernandez Buddin Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

International$1.9MHealth$1.2MEducation$355kArts & Culture$135k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $700k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$100,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CARAS OF THE AMERICAS$300,000
DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC$200,000
MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT$150,000
MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART SAN DIEGO$100,000
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$100,000
RADY CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION- SAN DIEGO$50,000
DIABETES RESEARCH CONNECTION$50,000
MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT$50,000
MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART SAN DIEGO$25,000
BUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JDRF INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 10%RADY CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION- SAN DIEGO: $50k → 11%DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $200k → 13%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $100k → 14%JDRF INTERNATIONAL: $15k → 10%RADY CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION- SAN DIEGO: $50k → 11%DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $200k → 13%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $100k → 14%MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART SAN DIEGO: $100k → 11%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $100k → 14%RADY CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION- SAN DIEGO: $50k → 11%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $100k → 14%MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART SAN DIEGO: $25k → 11%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $100k → 14%DIABETES RESEARCH CONNECTION: $50k → 11%DIABETES RESEARCH CONNECTION: $25k → 11%DIABETES RESEARCH CONNECTION: $25k → 11%MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $150k → 11%MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $50k → 11%MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $50k → 11%MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $50k → 11%MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $50k → 11%MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 34% of Fernandez Buddin Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Fernandez Buddin Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.8% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.4M · 7 repeat orgs$135k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$3.4M
$135k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
0%

Still filing today

86%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $135k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureInternationalEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CARAS OF THE AMERICAS
    4× · 2021–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +909%
  • DR
    DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $400k · revenue +20%
  • DR
    DIABETES RESEARCH CONNECTION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $100k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • MO
    MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART SAN DIEGO
    one grant, 2025 · $125k · revenue 0%
  • BF
    BUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY
    one grant, 2025 · $10k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
2
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

3
Diabetes Technology Society

To facilitate research into the treatment, monitoring, diagnosis and prevention of diabetes.

Health
4
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
5
American Diabetes Association

The mission of the American Diabetes Association is to prevent and cure diabetes and to improve the lives of all people affected by diabetes.

Health
6
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
7
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

8
The Broad Institute Inc

The mission of the broad institute is to propel progress in biomedicine, through research aimed at the understanding and treatment of disease and the dissemination of scientific knowledge to the scientific community to benefit the public.…

Health
9
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
10
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
11
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
12
Rhode Island School of Design

The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rady Children's Hospital Foundation San Diego and the most unlike its peers is Caras of the Americas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CARAS OF THE AMERICAS — $1,900,000 · InternationalCARAS OF THE AMERICASDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC — $400,000 · HealthDIABETES RESEARC…DIABETES RESEARCH CONNECTION — $100,000 · HealthDIABETES RESEARC…BREAKTHROUGH T1D — $35,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1DREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $500,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE …MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT — $355,000 · EducationMONARCH SCH…RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO — $150,000 · PhilanthropyMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART SAN DIEGO — $125,000 · Arts & CultureBUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY — $10,000 · Arts & Culture
International$1,900,000Health$535,000Other$500,000Education$355,000Philanthropy$150,000Arts & Culture$135,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCARAS OF THE AMERICAS — $1,900,000 over 4y, 8.2% of budgetDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC — $400,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT — $355,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO — $150,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART SAN DIEGO — $125,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetDIABETES RESEARCH CONNECTION — $100,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fernandez Buddin Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fernandez Buddin Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Fernandez Buddin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph