Skip to content

· Public charity

Fay-Genstone Foundation Inc

The Foundation's primary objective is to assist communities in which Fay Servicing, LLC and affiliates (the "Sponsor") have business activities and customers.

$158k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Youth Development$233kHuman Services$154kFood & Nutrition$64kEducation$34kCommunity Improvement$25kInternational$21kPublic Safety & Disaster$10k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $152,074, the rows itemized in this filing. The $157,727 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,653 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $61k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$10,773
Median grant
4
States reached
$80k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Guitars Over Guns Organization Inc$52,955
Wounded Warrior Project$12,927
Operation Support Our Troops - America$12,927
The Salvation Army of North Texas$11,963
Feeding Tampa Bay$11,963
Operation Homefront$10,773
The Salvation Army Metropolitan Division$9,602
The North Texas Food Bank$7,799
Salvation Army of Tampa$7,799
The Greater Chicago Food Depository$6,902
Lead The Way Fund$6,464
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Lead The Way Fund: $6k → 6%Wounded Warrior Project: $13k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IA
UT
KS
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$395k · 8 repeat orgs$145k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$395k
$106k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+23%

Still filing today

75%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GO
    GUITARS OVER GUNS ORGANIZATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $233k · revenue +81%
  • OS
    OPERATION SUPPORT OUR TROOPS - AMERICA INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $27k · revenue +9%
  • OH
    OPERATION HOMEFRONT INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $25k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • HT
    HOLY TRINITY HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $34k
  • AO
    ACADEMY OF THE HOLY NAMES
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • MM
    MY MEDIC INC
    one grant, 2022 · $21k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Bank of the Rockies

Food bank of the rockies ignites the power of community to nourish people facing food insecurity.

Food & Nutrition
2
Westmoreland County Food Bank Inc

Our mission is to enable our neighbors westmoreland county residents who are hungry or at risk of hunger to have ready access to food.

Food & Nutrition
3
Feeding America

Our mission is to advance change in America by ensuring equitable access to nutritious food for all in partnership with partner food banks, policymakers, supporters, and the communities we serve.

Food & Nutrition
4
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
5
Arizona Food Bank Network

Develop solutions to end hunger through food banking, public policy and innovation.

Food & Nutrition
6
Food Bank of the Albemarle

To fight hunger and poverty in northeastern north carolina.

Food & Nutrition
7
Operation Stand Down Tennessee

Operation stand down tennessee (osdtn) engages, equips, and empowers military veterans and their families through crisis, career, connection, and community services.

Human Services
8
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
9
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
10
Arkansas Foodbank

None

Food & Nutrition
11
Regional East Texas Food Bank

Etfb's mission is to fight hunger and feed hope in east texas.

—
12
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Operation Homefront Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lead the Way Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GUITARS OVER GUNS ORGANIZATION INC: $232,955 · Youth DevelopmentGUITARS OVER GUNS ORGANIZATION INCHOLY TRINITY HIGH SCHOOL: $33,840 · OtherHOLY TRINITY HIGH SCHOOLTHE SALVATION ARMY METROPOLITAN DIVISION: $32,026 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY METROPOLITAN DIVIS…ACADEMY OF THE HOLY NAMES: $25,000 · OtherACADEMY OF THE HOLY NAMESMY MEDIC INC: $20,875 · OtherMY MEDIC INCWOUNDED WARRIORS: $19,990 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIORSNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $17,419 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKThe Salvation Army of North Texas: $11,963 · OtherThe Salvation Army of North TexasBACKPACK DRIVE 2023: $10,064 · OtherBACKPACK DRIVE 2023Salvation Army of Tampa: $7,799 · OtherFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC: $22,113 · Food & NutritionFEEDING A…GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $17,912 · Food & NutritionGREATER C…COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $6,500 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $12,927 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 · Human ServicesLEAD THE WAY FUND INC: $6,464 · Human ServicesOPERATION SUPPORT OUR TROOPS - AMERICA INC: $27,277 · Public BenefitOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC: $25,123 · Community Improvement
Youth Development$232,955Other$178,976Food & Nutrition$46,525Human Services$29,391Public Benefit$27,277Community Improvement$25,123

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGUITARS OVER GUNS ORGANIZATION INC: $232,955 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetOPERATION SUPPORT OUR TROOPS - AMERICA INC: $27,277 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC: $25,123 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC: $22,113 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $17,912 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $17,419 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $12,927 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEAD THE WAY FUND INC: $6,464 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fay-Genstone Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fay-Genstone Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fay-Genstone Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Fay-Genstone Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fay-Genstone’s filings →

More from the funding graph