Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fawkes Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$44k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $26k
$3,080
Median grant
5
States reached
$880k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRACE COMMUNITY BIBLE CHURCH$26,024
CALEB WOULD GO INC$6,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$5,125
THE TWIG$3,080
GCHFA$2,260
THERE IS MORE MINISTRIES INC$538
CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL$468
WORLD VISION$420
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GCHFA: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
1/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRACE COMMUNITY BIBLE CHURCH INC: $26,024 · OtherGRACE COMMUNITY BIBLE CHURCH INCTHE TWIG: $3,080 · OtherTHE TWIG+1 more: $538 · OtherCaleb Would Go Inc: $6,000 · ReligionCaleb Would Go …FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5,125 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF…GCHFA INC GULF COAST HOMESCHOOL FINE ARTS: $2,260 · Human ServicesCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $468 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC: $420 · International
Other$29,642Religion$6,000Youth Development$5,125Human Services$2,260International$888

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5,125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGCHFA INC GULF COAST HOMESCHOOL FINE ARTS: $2,260 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $468 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $420 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fawkes’ filings →

More from the funding graph