· Public charity
Farmhouse Foundation
The FARMHOUSE FOUNDATION is a 501 c 3 public educational foundation formed in 1965 as a trust, to support the fraternity and its high standards of scholarship, character, personal growth, unity and
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $2,244,452 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,571,595 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $327,143 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k4 grants · $105k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $448k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ILLINOIS ASSOCIA | $940,388 |
| FARMHOUSE FRATER | $496,322 |
| MINNESOTA ASSOCI | $254,228 |
| IOWA ST ASSOCIAT | $170,243 |
| NC ST ASSOCIATIO | $121,400 |
| KANSAS ST ASSOCI | $104,681 |
| WASHINGTON ST AS | $52,000 |
| OHIO ST ASSOCIAT | $44,472 |
| OKLAHOMA ST ASSO | $21,645 |
| ARKANSAS ASSOCIA | $20,000 |
| NEBRASKA ASSOCIA | $19,073 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against -24% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $306k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FIFarmHouse International Fraternity Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $3.5M · revenue +122% · 32% of their budget
- KFKANSAS FARMHOUSE ASSOCIATION9× · 2017–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +112% · 88% of their budget
- MFMINNESOTA FARMHOUSE ASSOCIATION4× · 2017–2023 · $2.2M · revenue +47% · 43% of their budget
Funded once
- IFIDAHO FARMHOUSE CLUB INCone grant, 2023 · $323k · revenue -57% · 93% of their budget
- SDSOUTH DAKOTA FARMHOUSE FRATERNITYone grant, 2017 · $149k · revenue -7%
- AGABERDEEN GEM TRAIL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -43% · 57% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Housing for college fraternity
Provide living quarters in close proximity of Kansas State University campus for up to 84 student members of national organization (1 fraternity house)
Provide housing for college fraternity
To provide and manage the fraternity house for university students.
Provide and maintain fraternity house for the benefit of undergraduate members Capacity aprox. 53. Encourage students in literary subjects, more specifically agriculture and allied sciences. Provide organizational structure for alumni…
Provide room and board to undergraduate members attending the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Boston area schools
Operate Housing for the Wyoming Alpha Chapter of Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity
Provide student housing for members of Phi Gamma Delta Fraternity at the Pennsylvania State Univeristy
Provide Fraternity Housing.
The Alpha Nu Beta Theta Pi House Association provides housing to the Alpha Nu Chapter of the Beta Theta Pi Fraternity at the University of Kansas and its members. The Association owns and maintains a historically significant and culturally…
Operations of a Fraternity for young men on the campus of North Dakota State University. Fraternity operates the house where the young men live and meet while attending college
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Farmhouse Fraternity Inc and the most unlike its peers is Aberdeen Gem Trail Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 49 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FarmHouse International Fraternity Inc ↗
- Who funds KANSAS FARMHOUSE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA FARMHOUSE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA FARMHOUSE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FARMHOUSE FRATERNITY UNIVERSITY OF NEBRA ↗
- Who funds Missouri Farmhouse Association Inc ↗
- Who funds FARMHOUSE FRATERNITY ILLINOIS FARMHOUSE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds IOWA FARM HOUSE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PURDUE FARMHOUSE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Oklahoma FarmHouse Corporation ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA FARMHOUSE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds IDAHO FARMHOUSE CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds ATZFarmHouse Alumni Association ↗
- Who funds FARMHOUSE FRATERNITY INC ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN FARMHOUSE ASSOCIATION INC FARMHOUSE FRATERNITY INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH DAKOTA FARMHOUSE FRATERNITY ↗
- Who funds FARMHOUSE FRATERNITY AU CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds FarmHouse Fraternity ND Alumni Association ↗
- Who funds FARM HOUSE FRATERNITY INC ↗
- Who funds WSU FARMHOUSE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR FRATERNAL EXCELLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds ABERDEEN GEM TRAIL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FARM HOUSE FRATERNITY INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BURLINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds Passion 4 Paws Company ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Farmhouse Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Boys and Girls Club of Burlington Inc — 16% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Farmhouse Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Farmhouse Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.