Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Fariborz Fred Matloob Foundation

To support charities and non-profit organizations active in the united states, including those that take care of children in need.

$81k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

International$113kReligion$25kHealth$24kHuman Services$12k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 6 grants below total $58,762 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $81,132 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $22,370 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $46k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$337k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$15,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE JAFFA INSTITUTE$10,550
THE JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL$10,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS$10,000
CHAI LIFELINE INC$8,000
IRANIAN AMERICAN JEWISH FEDERATION$5,212
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%IRANIAN AMERICAN JEWISH FEDERATION: $20k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE JAFFA INSTITUTE: $11k → 13%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE: $5k → 17%IRANIAN AMERICAN JEWISH FEDERATION: $5k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE JAFFA INSTITUTE: $10k → 13%CHAI LIFELINE INC: $8k → 17%CHAI LIFELINE: $6k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE JAFFA INSTITUTE: $9k → 13%CHAI LIFELINE: $6k → 17%CHAI LIFELINE: $5k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE JAFFA INSTITUTE: $7k → 13%HOPE FOUNDATION: $7k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE JAFFA INSTITUTE: $5k → 13%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS: $10k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE JAFFA INSTITUTE: $5k → 13%FRIENDS OF THE JAFFA INSTITUTE: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Fariborz Fred Matloob Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Fariborz Fred Matloob Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.7% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$144k · 5 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$144k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-19%
+18%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
InternationalHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    THE INSTITUTE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF EDUCATION IN JAFFA INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $47k · revenue -19%
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    2× · 2023–2024 · $36k · revenue -33%
  • IA
    IRANIAN AMERICAN JEWISH CENTER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $25k

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE JAFFA INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +18%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
05the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
2/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE INSTITUTE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF EDUCATION IN JAFFA INC — $46,800 · InternationalTHE INSTITUTE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF EDUCATION IN JAFFA I…FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $36,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCESAMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE FOUNDATION — $5,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE FOUNDATIONIRANIAN AMERICAN JEWISH CENTER — $25,212 · OtherIRANIAN AMERICAN JEWISH CENTERHOPE FOUNDATION — $11,800 · OtherHOPE FOUNDATIONTHE JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL — $10,000 · OtherTHE JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAELFRIENDS OF THE JAFFA INSTITUTE — $5,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE JAFFA INSTITUTECHAI LIFELINE INC — $24,300 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE I…PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $10,000 · Philanthropy
International$87,800Other$52,012Health$24,300Philanthropy$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE INSTITUTE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF EDUCATION IN JAFFA INC — $46,800 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $36,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC — $24,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fariborz Fred Matloob Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fariborz Fred Matloob Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Fariborz Fred Matloob Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph