Skip to content

· Private foundation

Faithful Grace

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,800
Median grant
4
States reached
$28k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Ukraine Missionary HUN CHOI$9,200
FISHERS OF MEN CHRUCH$6,500
Jordan Ministry DOKSOO KANG$6,035
GOSPEL CAMP FOR ALL NATIONS$4,500
Uganda Ministry YOUNGCHAN PARK$2,800
India Pastors ARVIND KUMAR SUBHASH$2,000
NK Missionary JAE HWANG$2,000
Golden Key Prison Ministry$1,000
HYOSARANG US MISSION$500
Pakistan Ministry Timothy Kang$220
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 42% of grant dollars ($15k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 58% that went abroad ($20k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%HYOSARANG US MISSION: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 58% of all-years giving ($20k)

5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Ukraine$9k · 1 grant
Jordan$6k · 1 grant
Uganda$3k · 1 grant
India$2k · 1 grant
Pakistan$220 · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its field
03the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2021–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2021 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
0/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Ukraine Missionary HUN CHOI: $9,200 · OtherUkraine Missionary HUN CHOIFISHERS OF MEN CHRUCH: $6,500 · OtherFISHERS OF MEN CHRUCHJordan Ministry DOKSOO KANG: $6,035 · OtherJordan Ministry DOKSOO KANGUganda Ministry YOUNGCHAN PARK: $2,800 · OtherUganda Ministry YOUNGCHAN PARKNK Missionary JAE HWANG: $2,000 · OtherNK Missionary JAE HWANGIndia Pastors ARVIND KUMAR SUBHASH: $2,000 · OtherIndia Pastors ARVIND KUMAR SUBHASHGOLDEN KEY PRISON MINISTRY: $1,000 · Other+1 more: $220 · OtherGOSPEL CAMP FOR ALL NATIONS INC: $4,500 · ReligionGOSPEL CAMP FO…HYOSARANGUS MISSION: $500 · Human Services
Other$29,755Religion$4,500Human Services$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHYOSARANGUS MISSION: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOSPEL CAMP FOR ALL NATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds HYOSARANGUS MISSION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Faithful Grace funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Faithful Grace. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY21–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Faithful Grace’s filings →

    More from the funding graph