Skip to content
Fair Housing Continuum Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Fair Housing Continuum Inc

Ensure equal housing opportunity and eliminate discrimination in florida.

$365k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$240k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Housing & Shelter$700kCivil Rights$258kHealth$60kCommunity Improvement$25k
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$240,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$381k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY HOUSING INITIATIVE$240,000
SPACE COAST CENTER FOR IND LIVING$125,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Disability Achievement Center: $11k → 12%Disability Achievement Center: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$814k · 3 repeat orgs$229k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$814k
$229k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+60%

Still filing today

100%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’22’23
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesCivil RightsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    COMMUNITY HOUSING INITIATIVE INC
    3× · 2017–2023 · $535k · revenue -33% · 30% of their budget
  • SC
    SPACE COAST CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC
    3× · 2018–2023 · $258k · revenue +1%
  • CA
    CARING AND SHARING CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $21k · revenue +85%

Funded once

  • MC
    Macedonia Community Development Corp of South Brevardgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $90k · revenue +60%
  • RT
    REBUILDING TOGETHER OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +108%
  • CO
    City of Melbourne
    one grant, 2018 · $39k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY HOUSING INITIATIVE INC: $535,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY HOUSING INITIATIVE INCTHE BREVARD NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT COALITION INC: $25,000 · Community ImprovementSPACE COAST CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC: $258,172 · Civil RightsSPACE COAST CENTER FOR INDEP…REBUILDING TOGETHER OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $50,000 · OtherREBUILDING T…City of Melbourne: $38,814 · OtherCity of Melb…Hillcrest Title: $25,000 · OtherHillcrest Ti…Macedonia Community Development Corp of South Brevard: $90,000 · Housing & ShelterMacedonia…CARING AND SHARING CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC: $21,149 · Human Services
Community Improvement$560,000Civil Rights$258,172Other$113,814Housing & Shelter$90,000Human Services$21,149

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY HOUSING INITIATIVE INC: $535,000 over 3y, 30% of budgetSPACE COAST CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC: $258,172 over 3y, 12% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $50,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetTHE BREVARD NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT COALITION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fair Housing Continuum Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fair Housing Continuum Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 45%
  • Space Coast Center for Independent Living Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Caring and Sharing Center for Independent Living Inc: 21% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fair Housing Continuum Inc?

Find your warmest path to Fair Housing Continuum Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fair Housing Continuum’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home