Skip to content

· Public charity

Evergreen Business Capital Community Finance

Our mission is to provide superior economic development solutions that support small business stability, growth, and job creation; and create increased income and wealth among people who do not yet have access to the economic mainstream.

$455k
Granted FY2022
46
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2022 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$9,891
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
QUARTERDECK$9,891
LIBERTY TAX SERVICE$9,891
CHAPIN'S MEDICAL BILLING SERVICE & CONS$9,891
MICHELLE SALON INC$9,891
SOUNDVIEW STRENGTH & CONDITIONING$9,891
CLIENTS ARM LLC$9,891
E KAY BARBER$9,891
ALL POINTS YARN LLC$9,891
LEGASEA DIVE$9,891
GOODHILL ENTERPRISES$9,891
NORTEX ENTERPRISES$9,891
NAVA AUTO BODY LLC$9,891
JACK'S COUNTRY RESTAURANT$9,891
ZENITH HOLLAND NURSERY$9,891
CREOLE SOUL$9,891
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%DES MOINES VISION CENTER: $10k → 9%THE LEGION OF BARBERS LLC: $10k → 9%ZENITH HOLLAND NURSERY: $10k → 9%HARPER STUDIOS INC: $10k → 9%CHIPS AWAY STULL LLC: $10k → 9%QUARTERDECK: $10k → 9%CREOLE SOUL: $10k → 9%DES MOINES THERAPEUTIC MASSAGE: $10k → 9%DIXIE'S TAX & FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC: $10k → 9%PRINT PLACE: $10k → 9%WILLIAM WILLOUGHBY: $10k → 9%TEACUP ENTERPRISES: $10k → 9%LEGASEA DIVE: $10k → 9%E KAY BARBER: $10k → 9%SALON TIMMY: $10k → 9%WALLY'S CHOWDER HOUSE: $10k → 9%URGENT CARE CHIROPRATIC: $10k → 9%JACK'S COUNTRY RESTAURANT: $10k → 9%MANDARIN KITCHEN: $10k → 9%KAIHANA: $10k → 9%PLANTING FLOWER LEARNING CENTER: $10k → 9%MICHELLE SALON INC: $10k → 9%SOUNDVIEW STRENGTH & CONDITIONING: $10k → 9%PRETTY NAILS CENTER: $10k → 9%DES MOINES ESCROW INC: $10k → 9%CHAPIN'S MEDICAL BILLING SERVICE & CONS: $10k → 9%MINITHE DOUGH-NUT: $10k → 9%NAVA AUTO BODY LLC: $10k → 9%ST JOHN BARBER SHOP: $10k → 9%OPTIMARK: $10k → 9%TUSCANY AT DES MOINES CREEK: $10k → 9%VIVA MEXICO INC: $10k → 9%NORTEX ENTERPRISES: $10k → 9%SHIVA YOGA LLC: $10k → 9%ALL POINTS YARN LLC: $10k → 9%DES MOINES SNACK SHACK: $10k → 9%SUKHA MASSAGE AND YOGA: $10k → 9%7TH SCALE BOUTIQUE: $10k → 9%SALON ECLIPSE: $10k → 9%GOODHILL ENTERPRISES: $10k → 9%ARTURO'S LLC: $10k → 9%LIBERTY TAX SERVICE: $10k → 9%CYNTHIA K TIMLICK INC: $10k → 9%NORTHWEST FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD: $10k → 9%PHO DINH: $10k → 9%CLIENTS ARM LLC: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2022–2022.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2022 to 2022, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

+46 more: $454,986 · Other+46 more
Other$454,986

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Ndc Housing & Economic Development Corporation - Group ReturnNY9.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ndc Housing & Economic Development Corporation - Group Return

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Evergreen Business Capital Community Finance?

Find your warmest path to Evergreen Business Capital Community Finance through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Evergreen Business Capital Community Finance’s filings →

More from the funding graph