Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Washington · Public charity

Everett Rowing Association

The Everett Rowing Association offers the premier rowing experience for adults and youth in the greater Everett area. The association combines recreation, social, and competitive opportunities that lead to building health, life skills, and rowing excellence.

$22k
Granted FY2018
1
Itemized grants FY2018
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Everett Rowing Association’s FY2018 grant dollars went to Community Foundation Of Snohomish County, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2018 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
’17
0
’18

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Itemized, FY2018
$12k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2018
$11,700
Largest grant, FY2018
$11,700
States reached, FY2018
1
Total assets, FY2018
$323k
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Philanthropy$26k

Top grantees

Largest grants in FY2018.

GREATER EVERETT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$11,700

Compare Everett Rowing Association with peer funders

About Everett Rowing Association

How much does Everett Rowing Association give?
Everett Rowing Association reported 1 itemized grants totaling $11,700, out of $22,495 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2018 IRS filing.
What does Everett Rowing Association fund?
By grant dollars, its largest causes are Philanthropy (100%).
Where is Everett Rowing Association based?
Everett Rowing Association is based in WA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $33k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2018, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Everett Rowing Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home