Skip to content
Evelyn & Bernard Woolman Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Evelyn & Bernard Woolman Family Foundation Inc

Support social welfare programs.

$175k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Philanthropy$213kHuman Services$125kInternational$90kCivil Rights$50kReligion$10k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County$60,000
Anti-Defamation League$25,000
Ferd & Gladys Alpert Jewish Family Service Inc$25,000
Daughters of Sarah Foundation$25,000
Jewish Federations of north America$20,000
Kavod-Ensuring Dignity for Holocaust Survivors$10,000
Beth Israel Congregation$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Kavod-Ensuring Dignity for Holocaust Survivors: $10k → 12%Kavod-Ensuring Dignity for Holocaust Survivors: $10k → 12%Kavod-Ensuring Dignity for Holocaust Survivors: $10k → 12%Ferd & Gladys Alpert Jewish Family Service Inc: $25k → 11%Ferd & Gladys Alpert Jewish Family Service Inc: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$225k · 5 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$225k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-8%
+1%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DO
    DAUGHTERS OF SARAH JEWISH FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $60k · revenue +80%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $50k · revenue -17%
  • JA
    JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue -28%

Funded once

  • IE
    ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +1%
  • The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Delegation of Jewish American Students (Dojas)
—
3
University of Judaism Foundation
—
4
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
6
The Jerusalem Connection
—
7
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
—
8
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
9
National Council of Jewish Women Inc Jersey Hills Section
—
10
Jewish Life Foundation
—
11
United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc

Uja-federation of new york (uja) cares for jews everywhere and new yorkers of all backgrounds, responds to crises close to home and far away, and shapes the jewish future. through strategic grantmaking, uja provides funding and resources…

Philanthropy
12
Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc

Jewish national fund gives all generations of jews a unique voice in building a prosperous future for the land of israel and its people.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Ferd and Gladys Alpert Jewish Family & Children Service of Palm Beach C Ounty Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $193,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INCPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INCTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INCDAUGHTERS OF SARAH JEWISH FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · OtherDAUGHTERS OF SAR…BETH ISRAEL CONGREGATION: $10,000 · OtherBETH ISRAEL CONG…JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL: $50,000 · InternationalJEWISH AGENCY FO…ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $10,000 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGENCY…The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $10,000 · InternationalThe American Jew…THE FERD AND GLADYS ALPERT JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICE OF PALM BEACH C OUNTY INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesTHE FERD AND GL…KAVOD: $30,000 · Human ServicesKAVODANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $50,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMA…
Philanthropy$233,000Other$70,000International$70,000Human Services$65,000Civil Rights$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $193,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDAUGHTERS OF SARAH JEWISH FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FERD AND GLADYS ALPERT JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICE OF PALM BEACH C OUNTY INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKAVOD: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Evelyn & Bernard Woolman Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Evelyn & Bernard Woolman Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Evelyn & Bernard Woolman Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Evelyn & Bernard Woolman Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Evelyn & Bernard Woolman Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home