Skip to content

· Private foundation

Eva Anderson Scholarship Tuw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$43k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$700
Median grant
2
States reached
$142k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROWAN UNIVERSITY$1,100
MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY$700
STOCKTON UNIVERSITY$700
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$700
ATLANTIC CAPE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$700
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY$400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $6k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $2k → 11%EAST STROUDSBURG UNIVERSITY: $1k → 12%DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $2k → 22%WAGNER COLLEGE: $1k → 11%MONROE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1k → 14%ITHACA COLLEGE: $1k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND: $1k → 7%ROWAN UNIVERSITY: $1k → 8%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY: $1k → 8%STOCKTON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY: $700 → 16%UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $2k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $700 → 11%DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $1k → 22%ROWAN UNIVERSITY: $1k → 8%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY: $400 → 8%STOCKTON UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $1k → 10%DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $1k → 22%ROWAN UNIVERSITY: $1k → 8%ATLANTIC CAPE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $1k → 10%STOCKTON UNIVERSITY: $700 → 11%ATLANTIC CAPE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $700 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$34k · 7 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
7

Total granted

$34k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+5%

Still filing today

57%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $700 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DU
    DREXEL UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2017–2022 · $10k · revenue +10%
  • UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
    4× · 2020–2023 · $10k · revenue +29%
  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    2× · 2022–2025 · $2k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • ES
    EAST STROUDSBURG UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • IC
    ITHACA COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $9,750 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARERUTGERS UNIVERSITY: $3,650 · OtherRUTGERS UNIVERSITYSTOCKTON UNIVERSITY: $3,450 · OtherSTOCKTON UNIVERSITYROWAN UNIVERSITY: $3,350 · OtherROWAN UNIVERSITYEAST STROUDSBURG UNIVERSITY: $1,250 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND: $1,250 · OtherMONROE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1,250 · OtherWAGNER COLLEGE: $1,000 · Other+1 more: $700 · OtherDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $10,250 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $2,200 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHATLANTIC CAPE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATI: $1,700 · EducationATLANTIC CAPE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIITHACA COLLEGE: $1,250 · EducationITHACA COLLEGEMONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC: $1,000 · EducationMONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INCARCADIA UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationARCADIA UNIVERSITY
Other$25,650Education$17,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $10,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $9,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTIC CAPE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATI: $1,700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetITHACA COLLEGE: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARCADIA UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTIC CAPE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATI ↗
  • Who funds ITHACA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds ARCADIA UNIVERSITY ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eva Anderson Scholarship Tuw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eva Anderson Scholarship Tuw. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 25%
  • University of Delaware: 25% of income from government
  • Monmouth University Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eva Anderson Scholarship Tuw’s filings →

More from the funding graph