Skip to content

· Private foundation

Eugene J Eder Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
36
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$9.1MEducation$3.0MInternational$1.4MHuman Services$544kCrime & Legal$500kFood & Nutrition$500kArts & Culture$426kYouth Development$296kOther$0
02FY2024 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $351k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $791k
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.2M
$22,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$57M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,710,000
MILWAUKEE JEWISH DAY SCHOOL$481,260
YOUNG JUDAEA GLOBAL INC$161,000
THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY$115,000
FRIENDS OF IMPJ$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF WI LAW SCHOOL$100,000
HUNGER TASK FORCE$77,000
UPSTREAM ARTS$70,000
NIRIM USA$60,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT$58,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$50,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION INC$47,700
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY$41,000
RAMAH OF THE ROCKIES$40,000
MILWAUKEE JEWISH FREE LOAN SOCIETY$32,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $190k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MILWAUKEE JEWISH FREE LOAN SOCIETY: $50k → 17%MILWAUKEE JEWISH FREE LOAN SOCIETY: $50k → 17%MILWAUKEE JEWISH FREE LOAN SOCIETY: $33k → 17%MILWAUKEE JEWISH FREE LOAN SOCIETY: $25k → 17%MILWAUKEE JEWISH FREE LOAN SOCIETY: $25k → 17%INTERFAITH CONFERENCE OF MILW: $3k → 17%INTERFAITH CONFERENCE OF GREATER MILWAUKEE: $3k → 17%INTERFAITH CONFERENCE OF MILW: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OH
CA
CO
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15M · 35 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
5

Total granted

$15M
$63k

Still filing today

69%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YJ
    YOUNG JUDAEA GLOBAL INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $772k · revenue +50%
  • FO
    Friends of the Israel Movement for Progressive Judaism
    3× · 2022–2024 · $310k · revenue +49%
  • UPSTREAM ARTS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $271k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • ZC
    ZEIDLER CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL NER TAMID
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hillel Milwaukee

To promote and educate the general public regarding the jewish religion and culture and to provide services to jewish college students through various relevant programs

—
2
Jewish Federation of Madison Inc

To inspire, build, and sustain vibrant jewish life by fostering diverse opportunities to connect at every age and mobilizing our community in common purpose, in madison, israel, and around the world.

Religion
3
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
4
Jewish Federation of Greater Des Moines

The mission of the jewish federation of greater des moines is to further the continuity and welfare of the des moines, ames, and other central iowa jewish communities, and to enable these jewish communities to maximize their resources by…

Philanthropy
5
The Shalem Foundation

To promote and foster the creation of a zionist intellectual infrastructure for the state of israel, the development of a jewish national culture, and the establishment and promotion of intellectual and economic liberty.

Crime & Legal
6
The Jewish Federation of Nwi Inc

Enriching jewish life in northwest indiana, in israel and around the world through service, programming, advocacy and fundraising.

—
7
Friends of Yeshiva Beer Abraham

Furtherance of jewish education

Religion
8
Jewish Agency for Israel - North American Council

The jewish agency for israel - north american council (the organization"), was organized to work with and in support of nonprofit organizations in israel active in the fields of aliyah (immigration) and absorption; service to vulnerable…

International
9
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
10
Jewish Electorate Institute

The jewish electorate institute (jei) is an independent, non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization that surveys, interprets, reports, and educates the public about the perspectives, voting behaviors, and motivations of the american jewish…

Civil Rights
11
American Friends of Daas Aharon Inc

To promote, assist, and sponsor the spreading of Jewish religious education in Israel. The organization will also organize inspirational gatherings in the USA to enhance the participants' Torah knowledge.

Education
12
Darchei Noam Inc

To enhance jewish education for children in israel by developing advanced educational methods, focusing on the building of personal relationships with the students to ensure that the needs of each individual are met. every child can be…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milwaukee Jewish Day School Inc; the most unlike its peers is Grahams Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
21/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8,725,000 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONMILWAUKEE JEWISH DAY SCHOOL INC: $2,227,060 · OtherMILWAUKEE JEWISH DAY SCHOOL INCUNIVERSITY OF WI LAW SCHOOL: $500,000 · Other+25 more: $1,530,267 · Other+25 moreJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $320,000 · InternationalFriends of the Israel Movement for Progressive Judaism: $310,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT RUTH INC: $150,000 · InternationalWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $117,200 · InternationalTHE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA: $92,500 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE FORUM: $40,000 · InternationalYOUNG JUDAEA GLOBAL INC: $772,000 · EducationPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $467,095 · PhilanthropyAMERICA GIVES INC: $180,000 · PhilanthropyNIRIM USA INC: $110,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyUPSTREAM ARTS INC: $271,000 · Arts & CultureWISCONSIN CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureFREEDOM HONOR FLIGHT INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $182,500 · Human ServicesGRAHAMS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Human ServicesINTERFAITH CONFERENCE OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesRAMAH IN THE ROCKIES: $160,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$12,982,327International$1,029,700Education$772,000Philanthropy$762,095Arts & Culture$371,000Human Services$210,000Recreation & Sports$160,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMILWAUKEE JEWISH DAY SCHOOL INC: $2,227,060 over 5y, 13% of budgetYOUNG JUDAEA GLOBAL INC: $772,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $467,095 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $320,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $314,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFriends of the Israel Movement for Progressive Judaism: $310,000 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetUPSTREAM ARTS INC: $271,000 over 5y, 7.4% of budgetMILWAUKEE JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $182,500 over 5y, 19% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC: $180,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetRAMAH IN THE ROCKIES: $160,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT RUTH INC: $150,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetNATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC: $134,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $117,200 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNIRIM USA INC: $110,000 over 3y, 91% of budgetTHE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA: $92,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetWISCONSIN CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC INC: $75,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetFJC: $54,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC: $45,000 over 4y, 7.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE FORUM: $40,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetTikkun Ha-Ir of Milwaukee Inc: $25,000 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetGRAND AVENUE CLUB INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S OUTING ASSOCIATION: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFREEDOM HONOR FLIGHT INC: $25,000 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetOPERATION DREAM INC: $21,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetGRAHAMS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetCATHEDRAL CENTER INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetINTERFAITH CONFERENCE OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $7,500 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MILWAUKEE JEWISH DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG JUDAEA GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the Israel Movement for Progressive Judaism ↗
  • Who funds UPSTREAM ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA GIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds RAMAH IN THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT RUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY ↗
  • Who funds NIRIM USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds FJC ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE FORUM ↗
  • Who funds Tikkun Ha-Ir of Milwaukee Inc ↗
  • Who funds GRAND AVENUE CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S OUTING ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM HONOR FLIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION DREAM INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAHAMS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CATHEDRAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH CONFERENCE OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Milwaukee Jewish Federation IncWI26× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Milwaukee Jewish Federation Inc · Harri Hoffmann Family Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Anon Charitable Trust · Baird Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · The Marvin & Marilyn Zetley Family Foundation Ltd · Herbert H & Fern Elliott Family Foundation · Pelz Family Foundation Inc · Howard Frankenthal Family Foundation Ltd

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eugene J Eder Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eugene J Eder Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Eugene J Eder’s filings →

    More from the funding graph