Skip to content

· Private foundation

Eshel Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2021
24
Grants FY2021
6
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2021 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$540
Median grant
6
States reached
$236k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Horowitz Family Fund$4,370
Shul of the Lakes$3,800
Individual grant recipient$1,800
Educational Institute$1,800
Federation of Jewish Communities$1,500
Bonei Olam$1,005
Individual grant recipient$810
Individual grant recipient$770
Center of Jewish Life$770
Central Yeshiva Tomchei Temimim$540
Ten Yad Kallah Gemach$540
Beit David Highland Lakes$540
Charity Klein Orphans$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Charity Chabad of Dani$360
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%Ten Yad Kallah Gemach: $540 → 20%Bonei Olam: $1k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
2/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Horowitz Family Fund: $4,370 · OtherHorowitz Family FundShul of the Lakes: $3,800 · OtherShul of the LakesEducational Institute: $1,800 · OtherEducational InstituteIndividual grant recipient: $1,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFederation of Jewish Communities: $1,500 · OtherFederation of Jewish CommunitiesIndividual grant recipient: $810 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $770 · OtherCenter of Jewish Life: $770 · Other+14 more: $3,916 · Other+14 moreBonei Olam Inc: $1,005 · Human ServicesTEN YAD KALLAH GEMACH INC: $540 · Human Services
Other$19,536Human Services$1,545

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBonei Olam Inc: $1,005 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEN YAD KALLAH GEMACH INC: $540 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
  • Who funds TEN YAD KALLAH GEMACH INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eshel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eshel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Eshel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph