Skip to content

· Private foundation

Esbenshade Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$546k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.0MHealth$393kRecreation & Sports$329kPhilanthropy$75kHuman Services$10kScience & Tech$10kCommunity Improvement$5kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $38k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $251k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$8.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION$250,000
USGA$100,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$100,000
WOOD COUNTY SCHOOLS$51,450
UNITED WAY ALLIANCE OF THE MOV$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON$12,500
JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$10,000
FRIENDS OF VIENNA$5,000
MARCH OF DIMES$1,000
SALVATION ARMY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WV: $4k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IA
OH
PA
NJ
WV
NC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 14 repeat orgs$782k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
16

Total granted

$1.1M
$513k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
0%

Still filing today

36%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $269k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $385k · revenue +49%
  • TH
    THE HILL SCHOOL
    5× · 2020–2024 · $112k · revenue +17%
  • MC
    Marietta College
    4× · 2020–2023 · $43k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • JC
    JOHN CHAMBERS COLLEGE OF B AND E
    one grant, 2022 · $210k
  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $125k · revenue -17%
  • CC
    CLEVELAND CLINIC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
2
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
3
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
4
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
5
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
6
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
7
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
8
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
9
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
10
Mcv Associated Physicians

The mission of the organization is to provide physicians and other healthcare professionals to support the needs of the community, as well as the academic mission of the vcu school of medicine.

Health
11
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
12
Uvmc Foundation

Enhance the patient and family experience at upper valley medical center by raising community support for programs and services which help build healthy communities.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Virginia University Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Vienna. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

USGA: $300,000 · OtherUSGACLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $250,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATIONJOHN CHAMBERS COLLEGE OF B AND E: $210,000 · OtherJOHN CHAMBERS COLLEGE OF B AND ECLEVELAND CLINIC: $100,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINICWOOD COUNTY SCHOOLS: $70,950 · OtherWOOD COUNTY SCHOOLSUNITED WAY ALLIANCE OF THE MOV: $50,000 · Other+17 more: $138,300 · Other+17 moreDUKE UNIVERSITY: $385,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCTHE HILL SCHOOL: $112,000 · EducationTHE HILL SCHOOLMarietta College: $42,500 · EducationMarietta College+1 more: $12,500 · EducationJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $41,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $2,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF VIENNA: $5,000 · Community ImprovementUNITED STATES GOLF ASSOCIATION: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsAmerican Junior Golf Association Inc: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsMARCH OF DIMES INC: $1,000 · Health
Other$1,119,250Education$677,000Philanthropy$43,000Human Services$5,000Community Improvement$5,000Recreation & Sports$3,500Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $385,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HILL SCHOOL: $112,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMarietta College: $42,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $41,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES GOLF ASSOCIATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJupiter Hills Community Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican Junior Golf Association Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKERSBURG AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC (PREVIOUSLY PACF INC): $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HILL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Marietta College ↗
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF VIENNA ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES GOLF ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Jupiter Hills Community Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds American Junior Golf Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds PARKERSBURG AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC (PREVIOUSLY PACF INC) ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Esbenshade Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Esbenshade Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Esbenshade Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Esbenshade Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Esbenshade’s filings →

    More from the funding graph