Skip to content

· Private foundation

Erramuzpe Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$72k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$109kEducation$98kHealth$34kYouth Development$29kHousing & Shelter$28kCrime & Legal$22kHuman Services$19kInternational$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $45k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$640k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK$45,000
CHRIST COMMUNITY CHURCH$7,500
CHILD ENRICHMENT$6,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE CSRA$3,000
HERITAGE ACADEMY$3,000
AUGUSTA RESCUE MISSION$3,000
SAFE HOMES OF AUGUSTA$3,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SAFE HOMES OF AUGUSTA: $5k → 18%SAFE HOMES OF AUGUSTA: $3k → 18%SAFE HOMES OF AUGUSTA: $3k → 18%SAFE HOMES OF AUGUSTA: $3k → 18%GOOD NEIGHBOR MINISTRIES: $2k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$314k · 11 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against -30% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

$314k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
-30%

Still filing today

64%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $109k · revenue +44%
  • CE
    CHILD ENRICHMENT INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $22k · revenue +187%
  • SH
    SAFE HOMES OF AUGUSTA INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $17k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • AA
    APPARO ACADEMY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -30%
  • BF
    BURN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • AS
    AUGUSTA SYMPHONY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue -33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Georgia Agape Inc

The organization offers social services as a compassionate outreach to abused, neglected and dependent children and families in need. the organization strives to positively impact the lives of children, families and all those who receive…

—
2
Community Housing Services Agency Inc

As a community development financial institution ("cdfi"), and administrators of the savannah affordable housing fund ("sahf"), chsa provides financing and technical assistance to individuals and businesses. (continued at schedule…

Housing & Shelter
3
Homeaid Georgia Inc

HomeAids mission is to help people experiencing or at risk of homelessness build new lives through construction, community engagement, and education.

Employment
4
Georgia Court Appointed Special Advocates Inc

Georgia Court Appointed Special Advocates, Inc. (the Organization) is a nonprofit organization which strengthens and supports court-sanctioned, affiliate CASA programs that empower community volunteers who advocate for abused or neglected…

Civil Rights
5
Inner City Night Shelter Inc

A non-profit corporation that provides shelter for homeless men and women in savannah, georgia.

Housing & Shelter
6
Augustacsra Habitat for Humanity Inc

To sponsor specific projects in habitat development globally, by constructing modest but adequate housing, and to associate with other organizations functioning with purposes consistent with those of habitat, to witness to the gospel of…

—
7
Hope Atlanta Inc

Hope atlanta seeks to help georgians avoid homelessness and hunger through a comprehensive approach that equips them with the tools for lifelong stability.our vision is to end hunger and homelessness for every georgian.

—
8
Annandale At Suwanee Inc

To perpetuate a village community to provide progressive life assistance to adults with developmental disabilities so that they can maximize their abilities and maintain their independence in the least restrictive environment.

Health
9
Habitat for Humanity of Greater Chattanooga Area Inc

Habitat for humanity of greater chattanooga (hfh-gc) brings together businesses, churches, and other community organizations in partnership with low income families to spark authentic transformation in our city through the construction of…

Housing & Shelter
10
Turn Back the Block Inc

Turn back the block is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to reviatlize the harrisburg neighborhood in augusta, ga through the rehabilitation of existing housing stock, construction of new housing and the promotion of home ownership…

Housing & Shelter
11
Easter Seals East Georgia Inc

Easter Seals East Georgia's mission is to provide exceptional services to ensure that people with disabilities and barriers to employment maximize their potential for employment and independence and broaden their opportunities for full…

Human Services
12
The Augusta Preparatory Day School Inc

The augusta preparatory day school, inc. provides educational services to students in grades pre-k through 12.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Augusta Rescue Mission; the most unlike its peers is Jessye Norman School of the Arts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HERITAGE ACADEMY INC: $57,500 · OtherHERITAGE ACADEMY INCBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE CSRA: $28,500 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE CSRACHRIST COMMUNITY CHURCH: $21,500 · OtherCHRIST COMMUNITY CHURCHAPPARO ACADEMY INC: $20,000 · OtherAPPARO ACADEMY INCAUGUSTA RESCUE MISSION: $17,000 · OtherAUGUSTA RESCUE MISSIONTRANSITIONS HOMELESS CENTER: $9,500 · OtherTRANSITIONS HOMELESS CENTER+4 more: $9,400 · Other+4 moreGOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK INC: $109,100 · Food & NutritionGOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK INCCHILD ENRICHMENT INC: $22,000 · Crime & LegalFOUNDATION FOR EDS INC: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentSAFE HOMES OF AUGUSTA INC: $17,000 · Human ServicesGood Neighbor Ministries Inc: $1,500 · Human ServicesCHRIST COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES AUGUSTA INC: $8,000 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,500 · International
Other$163,400Food & Nutrition$109,100Crime & Legal$22,000Youth Development$20,000Human Services$18,500Health$8,000International$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK INC: $109,100 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD ENRICHMENT INC: $22,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAPPARO ACADEMY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR EDS INC: $20,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetSAFE HOMES OF AUGUSTA INC: $17,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAUGUSTA RESCUE MISSION: $17,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetCHRIST COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES AUGUSTA INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAUGUSTA SYMPHONY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGood Neighbor Ministries Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetJessye Norman School of the Arts Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD ENRICHMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds APPARO ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR EDS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HOMES OF AUGUSTA INC ↗
  • Who funds AUGUSTA RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds CHRIST COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES AUGUSTA INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds AUGUSTA SYMPHONY INC ↗
  • Who funds Good Neighbor Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Jessye Norman School of the Arts Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Creel-Harison Foundation IncGA22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Creel-Harison Foundation Inc · The Knox Foundation · The Community Foundation for the Central Savannah River Area Inc · Tr Dorothy M Buttolph Fdn · Arthur H Merry & Ernest B Merry Foundation Inc · Richards Family Foundation · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Clinton-Anderson Hospital Inc · Cullum Foundation · Ramachandra and Niranjini Reddy Foundation Inc · University Health Services Inc · United Way of the Csra Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Erramuzpe Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Erramuzpe Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Erramuzpe Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Erramuzpe Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Erramuzpe’s filings →

    More from the funding graph