Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Erol Foundation US

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$789k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$220k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.

Environment$1.1MPhilanthropy$395kHealth$230kCivil Rights$210kRecreation & Sports$190kPublic Benefit$40kHuman Services$30kHousing & Shelter$29kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $322k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $460k
$20,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$352k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION$220,000
EASTERN WOODLAND LACROSSE$140,000
YALE UNIVERSITY$50,000
VIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC$50,000
COMMUNITIES FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT$40,327
WESTERN REGIONAL ADVOCACY PROJECT$28,000
REDFORD CENTER INC$25,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE ALLEGHENIES$25,000
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ALLIANCE$20,000
ACTION FOR THE CLIMATE EMERGENCY INC$20,000
DEEP SOUTH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE$20,000
JOBS WITH JUSTICE SAN FRANCISCO$20,000
EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE INC$20,000
KYES CLIMATE ACTION FUND$20,000
THE PACHAMAMA ALLIANCE$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%WESTERN REGIONAL ADVOCACY PROJECT: $28k → 10%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $30k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
VA
AZ
NC
DC
LA
AL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 7 repeat orgs$833k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of -17% since the first grant, against -26% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
13

Total granted

$1.1M
$542k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-17%
-26%

Still filing today

86%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $291k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
EnvironmentCivil RightsHuman ServicesArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HONOR THE EARTH
    2× · 2022–2023 · $300k · revenue -17%
  • The Partnership Project Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $300k · revenue -23%
  • EASTERN WOODLAND LACROSS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $190k · revenue -30%

Funded once

  • PG
    PRACTICE GREENHEALTH
    one grant, 2023 · $225k · revenue -6%
  • PC
    PACT COLLECTIVEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +784%
  • TC
    THE COMMONWEALTH CLUB - WORLD AFFAIRS OF CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2022 · $40k · revenue -5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
2
Nature for Justice

To empower frontline communities to lead nature-based solutions that advance climate justice, ecosystem restoration, and resilient livelihoods through connecting locally-led initiatives to funding, markets, and technical support.

Environment
3
Partnership for Policy Integrity

Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI) uses data-driven advocacy and litigation to fight for forests, communities and the climate.

Environment
4
Taproot Earth

Taproot Earth works with communities to support strategies around the use of water, energy and land.

Environment
5
The Alliance for Collective Action

The Alliance for Collective Action convenes leaders of environmental and social movements to advance solutions for a thriving planet. We advance our mission through the Alliance Center building and community, as well as through Collective…

Environment
6
CarbonPlan

Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.

Environment
7
Amazon Watch Inc

To protect the rainforest and advance the rights of Indigenous peoples in the Amazon Basin. We partner with Indigenous communities in campaigns for human rights, corporate accountability, and the preservation of the Amazon Basin's…

Environment
8
Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide

Educational & charitable. to provide legal and scientific information to public interest attorneys and scientists in numerous countries.

—
9
Rogue Climate

Rogue Climate's mission is to empower Southern Oregon communities most impacted by climate change including low-income, rural, youth, seniors & communities of color, to win climate justice by organizing for clean energy, sustainable jobs &…

Education
10
Earthcorps

To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.

International
11
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
12
350PDX

Building a diverse grassroots movement to address the causes of climate disruption through justice-based solutions by inspiring, training and mobilizing people to act.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Goodpower Education Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is River Valley Organizing. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyGovernment Accountability R…Community FoundationsLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Native Hawaiian Community D…South Asian Cultural and Sp…Asian American Advocacy & H…Land Conservation Organizat…Environmental Advocacy Orga…Pregnancy Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%6%<5yr14%18%5–10yr19%35%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%3%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%4%<5yr14%17%5–10yr19%38%10–20yr16%10%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%2%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/38
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,527

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/38
Grantees still filing
7/38
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HONOR THE EARTH — $300,000 · EnvironmentHONOR THE EARTHThe Partnership Project Inc — $300,000 · EnvironmentThe Partnership Project IncFRIENDS OF THE EARTH — $100,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE EARTHPACT COLLECTIVE — $50,000 · EnvironmentCOMMUNITIES FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT — $40,327 · Environment+12 more — $243,145 · Environment+12 moreLIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION — $320,000 · PhilanthropyLIBERTY HILL FOUNDA…ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $30,000 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER PHILANT…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER JOHNSTOWN — $25,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATIO…THE BATTERY FOUNDATION — $20,000 · PhilanthropyPRACTICE GREENHEALTH — $225,237 · HealthPRACTICE GR…EASTERN WOODLAND LACROSS — $190,000 · Arts & CultureEASTERN W…THE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureYALE UNIVERSITY — $71,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSI…THE COMMONWEALTH CLUB - WORLD AFFAIRS OF CALIFORNIA — $40,000 · OtherTHE COMMONWEA…RIVER VALLEY ORGANIZING — $20,000 · OtherRIVER VALLEY …Yellowhammer Fund — $30,000 · OtherYellowhammer …MIDWEST ACCESS COALITION — $20,000 · OtherMIDWEST ACCES…San Francisco Housing Action Coalition — $29,080 · OtherSan Francisco…Jobs with Justice San Francisco — $20,000 · OtherJobs with Jus…CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $16,000 · OtherCENTER FOR BI…MAGNOLIA TREE EARTH CENTER OF BEDFORD STUYVESANT — $13,000 · OtherTHE HACK FOUNDATION D/B/A HACK CLUB — $10,000 · Other+1 more — $5,000 · OtherVIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC — $100,000 · Community ImprovementTHE DESCENDANTS PROJECT — $12,000 · Community ImprovementTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesWestern Regional Advocacy Project — $28,000 · Human Services
Environment$1,033,472Philanthropy$395,000Health$225,237Arts & Culture$200,000Other$274,080Community Improvement$112,000Human Services$58,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION — $320,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHONOR THE EARTH — $300,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetThe Partnership Project Inc — $300,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPRACTICE GREENHEALTH — $225,237 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetEASTERN WOODLAND LACROSS — $190,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetVIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE EARTH — $100,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPACT COLLECTIVE — $50,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT — $40,327 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE COMMONWEALTH CLUB - WORLD AFFAIRS OF CALIFORNIA — $40,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTETIAROA SOCIETY — $30,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetYellowhammer Fund — $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOGOREA TE LAND TRUST — $29,480 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSan Francisco Housing Action Coalition — $29,080 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetWestern Regional Advocacy Project — $28,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetREDFORD CENTER INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER JOHNSTOWN — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Pachamama Alliance — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDEEP SOUTH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BATTERY FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMIDWEST ACCESS COALITION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGOODPOWER EDUCATION FUND INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCalifornia Environmental Justice Alliance — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJobs with Justice San Francisco — $20,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetThe Stewardship Network — $17,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $16,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAGNOLIA TREE EARTH CENTER OF BEDFORD STUYVESANT — $13,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetTHE DESCENDANTS PROJECT — $12,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HACK FOUNDATION D/B/A HACK CLUB — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBroadleaf Health and Education Alli — $5,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetAsian Pacific Environmental Network — $1,665 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Resources Legacy FundAmalgamated Charitabl…Windward FundThe Schmidt Family Fo…Silicon Valley Commun…Tides FoundationThe San Francisco Fou…Sierra ClubRockefeller Family Fu…United States Energy …ImpactassetsincThe Kresge Foundation
Resources Legacy FundCA21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Resources Legacy Fund · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Windward Fund · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Sierra Club · Rockefeller Family Fund Inc · United States Energy Foundation · Impactassetsinc · The Kresge Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Erol Foundation US funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Erol Foundation US?

    Find your warmest path to Erol Foundation US through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines