Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Washington, D.C. · Public charity

Environmental Working Group

The ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP (ewg) is committed to empowering people to live healthier lives in healthier environments. We are a nonprofit research and advocacy organization with a community made up of millions of consumers who stand-up for healthy food, farms, water and people.

$21k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
1
Itemized grants FY2025
5
Organizations funded FY2020
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$10k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$10,000
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$24M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
World Central Kitchen Inc$32,56510%
Black Belt Justice Center$15,00016%
Comite de Apoyo a Los Trabajadores Agricolas Inc$10,00012%
Solar Rights Alliance$10,00012%
Farmworker Justice Fund Inc$10,00010%
Accion Politica Pcunista Dba Pcun$10,00011%

Compare Environmental Working Group with peer funders

About Environmental Working Group

How much does Environmental Working Group give?
Environmental Working Group reported 1 itemized grants totaling $10,000, out of $21,000 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing.
What does Environmental Working Group fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2025, its largest causes are Public Safety & Disaster (42%), Crime & Legal (19%), Arts & Culture (13%).
Who are Environmental Working Group's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: World Central Kitchen Inc ($33k), Black Belt Justice Center ($15k), Comite de Apoyo a Los Trabajadores Agricolas Inc ($10k).
Where is Environmental Working Group based?
Environmental Working Group is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Environmental Working Group’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home