Skip to content

· Public charity

Entrepreneur Startup Business Development Corporation

Arch grants advances economic development and community revitalization by providing equity-free grants of up to $100,000 and dynamic wraparound support to startup entrepreneurs willing to headquarter their businesses in st.

$1.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$5.1MScience & Tech$1.6MHealth$1.4MArts & Culture$600kYouth Development$550kFood & Nutrition$485kAnimals$325kHousing & Shelter$310kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k23 grants · $1.9M
$75,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AVOL INC$100,000
PRINTERIOR$100,000
WORDS LIIVE$100,000
ROAM STAY INC$100,000
EXPRIMARY INC$100,000
PREZERVE TECHNOLOGIES$100,000
WINGXPAND$100,000
HIRE HENRY$75,000
DEMIBLUE NATURAL NAILS$75,000
REAL DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS$75,000
HORIZONTAL BASE STUDS$75,000
ASL ASPIRE$75,000
MATCH NP$75,000
POSIE POTS & 3D PRINTS$75,000
ORGACUITY$75,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SINGULARITY AG INTERNATIONAL INC: $100k → 10%VETVERIFI INC: $75k → 10%PREZERVE TECHNOLOGIES: $100k → 16%NUTRIBLE: $100k → 10%SEOUL JUICE LLC: $100k → 14%EXPRIMARY INC: $100k → 14%MOODEAUX LLC: $100k → 14%ACNEAWAY INC: $100k → 17%AVOL INC: $100k → 20%QUERITEL: $100k → 16%DENSCORE: $100k → 10%CARMA: $100k → 5%HYPNO LOOPS INC: $75k → 11%JAKAPA: $75k → 14%FORCYTE LLC: $75k → 15%ALLUMIN8: $75k → 15%HIRE HENRY: $75k → 16%BOLD SPOON CREAMERY: $75k → 19%GATEWAY QUANTUM ELECTRONICS LLC: $75k → 21%THE GIRLS COMPANY: $100k → 8%GRAB MY BAG INC: $100k → 14%BESTFIT: $100k → 18%ROAM STAY INC: $100k → 9%FLORA: $100k → 14%ASL ASPIRE: $75k → 19%MIDGARD RAVEN LLC: $100k → 4%WORDS LIIVE: $100k → 6%CHIPPIN INC: $100k → 7%INCLUSIVELY: $100k → 22%NOVEIL: $100k → 10%ZPODS LLC: $100k → 5%MARSFARM CORPORATION: $75k → 11%HABITERRE: $100k → 19%AIRSEAL CARDIOVASCULAR: $75k → 11%DATAPLANT: $100k → 21%HANDS FREE LLC: $100k → 21%WINGXPAND: $100k → 21%GENERATION MINDFUL LLC: $100k → 11%PRINTERIOR: $100k → 11%SWIPESUM INC: $100k → 11%ESSENTIAL REAL ESTATE LLC: $100k → 11%RETRAILER LLC DBA BIG HEART TEA: $100k → 21%GIFTAMEAL: $100k → 21%MODULE BUILDING SYSTEMS: $100k → 21%PANA MINA LLC: $100k → 21%HIVE MEDICAL: $100k → 21%NATIVE PET: $100k → 21%REBUNDLE: $100k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
CA
UT
MO
VA
DE
TN
NC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

20%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 22 repeat orgs$10M to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
144

Total granted

$2.5M
$8.6M

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • W
    WINGXPAND
    2× · 2022–2024 · $175k
  • G
    GIFTAMEAL
    3× · 2018–2021 · $156k
  • HC
    HONEYMOON CHOCOLATES
    3× · 2021–2024 · $150k

Funded once

  • MR
    MIDGARD RAVEN LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • CI
    CHIPPIN INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • D
    DENSCORE
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 185 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

+185 more: $12,572,171 · Other+185 more
Other$12,572,171

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Washington UniversityMO20.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 0 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Washington University · P33

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 185 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Entrepreneur Startup Business Development’s filings →

More from the funding graph