Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Entegris Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$500k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Education$2.1MHealth$250kInternational$27kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $175k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $325k
$25,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS$75,000
COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES FOUNDATION$75,000
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION$75,000
TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION$25,000
DENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FDN INC$25,000
RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE$25,000
ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$25,000
NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 82% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $75k → 8%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $75k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $75k → 11%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $50k → 11%ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $50k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION: $50k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FDN INC: $75k → 11%COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES FOUNDATION: $75k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $100k → 12%NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC: $25k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION: $25k → 19%NTHU NORTH AMERICA FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $75k → 8%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $50k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $75k → 11%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $50k → 11%ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $50k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION: $50k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FDN INC: $75k → 11%COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES FOUNDATION: $50k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $75k → 12%NTUADF: $25k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION: $25k → 19%NTHU NORTH AMERICA FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 11%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $75k → 11%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $50k → 11%ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $50k → 14%TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION: $25k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FDN INC: $50k → 11%COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES FOUNDATION: $25k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $75k → 12%NTUADF: $25k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION: $25k → 19%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $25k → 11%ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $25k → 14%TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION: $25k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FDN INC: $25k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $50k → 12%NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC: $25k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $75k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $25k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS FDN INC: $50k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.4M · 16 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
0

Total granted

$2.4M
$0

Still filing today

75%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
    5× · 2021–2025 · $200k · revenue +20%
  • Rochester Institute of Technology
    5× · 2021–2025 · $200k · revenue +29%
  • NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $175k · revenue +53%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

    Education
    2
    University of Virginia Investment Management Company

    The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

    Education
    3
    Indiana University Foundation

    The Indiana University Foundation (IUF) maximizes private philanthropic support for Indiana University by fostering lifelong relationships with key stakeholders and providing advancement leadership and fundraising services for (Continued…

    Education
    4
    Furman University

    The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

    Education
    5
    The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

    To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

    Education
    6
    University of New Haven

    The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

    Education
    7
    The Uc Davis Foundation

    The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

    Education
    8
    Trustees of Dartmouth College

    Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

    Education
    9
    Colorado State University Foundation

    See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…

    Education
    10
    University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

    To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

    Education
    11
    Trinity University

    Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

    Education
    12
    The Trustees of Princeton University

    Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

    Education

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Massachusetts Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Denver Scholarship Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    13/13
    Grantees still filing
    9/13
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $325,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $300,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATIONTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC — $250,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INCRensselaer Polytechnic Institute — $200,000 · EducationRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteRochester Institute of Technology — $200,000 · EducationRochester Institute of TechnologyNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $175,000 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITYTexas A&M Foundation — $175,000 · EducationTexas A&M FoundationCOLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES FOUNDATION — $150,000 · EducationCOLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES FOUNDATIONUniversity of Illinois Foundation — $75,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 · Education+1 more — $50,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS — $225,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSAC…NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC — $75,000 · OtherNATIONAL TAIWAN UNIV…NTUADF — $50,000 · OtherNTUADFNTHU NORTH AMERICA FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · OtherNTHU NORTH AMERICA F…THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TE…GIVE2ASIA — $26,882 · International
    Education$1,975,000Other$450,000International$26,882

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $325,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $300,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC — $250,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRensselaer Polytechnic Institute — $200,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology — $200,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $175,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation — $175,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation — $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGIVE2ASIA — $26,882 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Entegris Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
    • Northeastern University7% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Entegris Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Entegris Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph