· Public charity
Enjoining Good USA Incorporated
A non profit organization to empower marginal people to win against poverty foster research and educational opportunity and provide health services for under served community.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Various small US nonprofits less than 5000 each | $9,020 |
Where the grant dollars land
Across the US and around the world.
Grants abroad, by region: $187k on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 1 region, $95k to organizations and $92k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: Shelter, food, and Medical support for OLD home (Shailan Probeen Nibash) · Orphanage Support to mutiple orphanages · Refugee Relief and support for flood and earthquake victims
How this is measured
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2025–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2025 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 1 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Enjoining Good USA Incorporated?
Find your warmest path to Enjoining Good USA Incorporated through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Enjoining Good USA’s filings →