Skip to content

· Private foundation

Engel Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$70kEducation$55kYouth Development$5kRecreation & Sports$5kArts & Culture$3kEnvironment$3kMembership Benefit$2kPhilanthropy$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$91k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HISTORY CENTER OF LAKE FOREST-LAKE$3,500
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$1,600
MIAMI UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$1,000
PHI KAPP TAU FOUNDATION$1,000
COUNTRY CLUB OF FLORIDA SCHOLARSHIP$1,000
FREINDS OF LAKE FOREST LIBRARY$500
EVANS SCHOLORSHIP FOUNDATION$500
WESTERN GOLF ASSOCIATION SCHOLARSHI$500
GLEN VIEW CLUB SCHOLARSHIP$250
Individual grant recipient$250
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CARIDAD CENTER: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MA
IN
OH
WV
VA
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$145k · 15 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
20

Total granted

$145k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+12%

Still filing today

53%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $950 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    Miami University Foundation
    5× · 2021–2025 · $10k · revenue +14%
  • HC
    History Center of Lake Forest-Lake Bluff
    2× · 2024–2025 · $7k · revenue +61%
  • WG
    WESTERN GOLF ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $3k · revenue +752%

Funded once

  • AU
    ALPHA USA
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • MU
    MIAMI UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.

—
2
Florida Gulf Coast University Foundation Inc

To advance florida gulf coast university and its students by promoting the institution, securing philanthropy to support the needs of the university, managing and administering assets with a long term perspective, and providing resources…

Education
3
University of South Florida Foundation Inc

University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…

Education
4
Friends of Forman Christian College Inc

Friends of Forman Christian College is dedicated to supporting the high-quality educational mission of Forman Christian College to develop informed, ethical and responsible citizens of Pakistan who exemplify the FCCU motto, "By love serve…

Education
5
Lycee Francais de Chicago Inc

The Lycee Francais de Chicago, driven by our core values of respect, responsibility and the joy of learning, empowers students to grow into active global citizens.

Education
6
The Florida State University Foundation Inc

The florida state university foundation enhances the academic mission and vision of florida state university through its organized fundraising activities and funds management. the fsu foundation accomplishes its mission by fostering…

Education
7
University of Illinois Foundation

The Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charitable organization, is an independent and separate nonprofit entity from the University of Illinois. Our mission is to encourage and administer private gifts and serve the UI System by working closely with…

Education
8
Cfa Society Chicago

Cfa society chicago, the world's first investment analysts' society, is committed to working with our members and the investment community to achieve our mission through three organizational pillars: (1) deliver member value: deliver…

—
9
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
10
Chicago Public Library Foundation

The chicago public library foundation was established in 1986 as an independent nonprofit dedicated to connecting private investment with innovative and community-responsive programming that leverages our library's city-wide footprint,…

Education
11
Lake Forest College

Provide post-secondary education leading to a baccalaureate degree. Program service expenditures are made in conjunction with the operation of a liberal arts college spread over 107 acres with approximately 63 educational and support…

Education
12
University of Central Florida Foundation Inc

The ucf foundation encourages, stewards and celebrates charitable contributions from alumni and friends to support university of central florida (ucf).

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Reading Power Inc; the most unlike its peers is Faraja Fund Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $71,350 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHFARAJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $37,500 · OtherFARAJA SCHOOL FOUNDATIONHistory Center of Lake Forest-Lake Bluff: $6,500 · OtherALPHA USA: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · Other+25 more: $23,225 · Other+25 moreMiami University Foundation: $10,300 · Education+2 more: $500 · EducationFARAJA FUND FOUNDATION: $1,500 · PhilanthropyREADING POWER INC: $1,450 · Youth DevelopmentLA CASA NORTE: $1,050 · Housing & ShelterCaridad Center Inc: $500 · Human ServicesGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $200 · Food & Nutrition
Other$148,575Education$10,800Philanthropy$1,500Youth Development$1,450Housing & Shelter$1,050Human Services$500Food & Nutrition$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMiami University Foundation: $10,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHistory Center of Lake Forest-Lake Bluff: $6,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPHI KAPPA TAU FOUNDATION: $2,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN GOLF ASSOCIATION: $2,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COUNTRY CLUB OF FLORIDA: $1,900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFARAJA FUND FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetREADING POWER INC: $1,450 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLA CASA NORTE: $1,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF LAKE FOREST LIBRARY INC: $700 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCaridad Center Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGODPARENTS FOR TANZANIA: $300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRESCUE MISSIONS MINISTRIES INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF BRENNEMANN: $200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Miami University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds History Center of Lake Forest-Lake Bluff ↗
  • Who funds PHI KAPPA TAU FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN GOLF ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE COUNTRY CLUB OF FLORIDA ↗
  • Who funds FARAJA FUND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds READING POWER INC ↗
  • Who funds LA CASA NORTE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF LAKE FOREST LIBRARY INC ↗
  • Who funds Caridad Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds GODPARENTS FOR TANZANIA ↗
  • Who funds RESCUE MISSIONS MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BRENNEMANN ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Engel Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Engel Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Caridad Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Engel Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph