Skip to content

· Private foundation

Emet Vemunah Sam & Samantha Sasson Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
31
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$326k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$3.7MPhilanthropy$409kCivil Rights$379kHuman Services$304kEducation$105kHealth$78kYouth Development$13kFood & Nutrition$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $65k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $237k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $578k
  • $250k+1 grant · $326k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$80k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BET MEDRASH GADOL ATERET TORAH$325,500
YAD YOSEF$242,053
VARIOUS OTHER CHARITIES$123,143
YESHIVAT ATERET TORAH$113,000
CONGREGATION OHR MEIR$100,000
YESHIVA KOL YAAKOV$36,000
SHORE AREA MIKVAH$35,000
Individual grant recipient$31,101
FRIENDS OF AHAVAT SHALOM$27,600
Individual grant recipient$26,000
CONGREGATION MESHECH CHOCHMA$24,000
BET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE$15,200
Individual grant recipient$12,000
CONGREGATION TZAMRA INC$10,000
UNITED CHILDRENS EDUCATION FOUNDATI$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $304k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $150k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $50k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $50k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $50k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $3k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.2M · 43 repeat orgs$267k to everyone else

43 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
15

Total granted

$5.2M
$109k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+75%

Still filing today

30%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $158k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionPhilanthropyHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $304k · revenue +67%
  • SM
    SEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $99k · revenue +31%
  • BY
    BET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $47k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • ST
    SEPHARDIC TORAH CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $22k
  • YO
    YESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue +94%
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BNEI YESHIVA
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Yeshiva Derech Hatorah-Yeshivat Mizrachi Lbanim

A school-section 170(b)(1)(a)(ii), operating from the preschool pre-k level through high school, and chartered ny the new york state education department and board of regents.

Education
3
Yeshiva Keren Hatorah of Passaic- Clifton

To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.

Education
4
Yeshiva Chayei Olam

Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…

Education
5
Yeshivat Or Hachaim of Lakewood Inc

Parochial elementary school with a focus on sephardic tradition.

Education
6
Sherit Isroel
—
7
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
8
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
9
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
10
Yeshiva Yesodei Hachaim

To provide secondary high school education in Brooklyn, NY

—
11
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
12
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bet Yaakov Oz Vehadar Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ilan High School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YAD YOSEF: $1,781,686 · OtherYAD YOSEFATERET TORAH CENTER: $497,612 · OtherATERET TORAH CENTERVARIOUS OTHER CHARITIES: $409,478 · OtherVARIOUS OTHER CHARITIESBET MEDRASH GADOL ATERET TORAH: $399,250 · OtherBET MEDRASH GADOL ATERET TORAHSYNAGOGUE OF DEAL: $379,429 · OtherSYNAGOGUE OF DEALIndividual grant recipient: $360,151 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+43 more: $957,615 · Other+43 moreSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $303,500 · Human ServicesSEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC: $99,000 · ReligionUNITED CHILDRENS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · ReligionTORAH LEARNING RESOURCES LTD: $6,603 · ReligionYeshivat Lev Torah: $4,600 · ReligionBET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC: $46,600 · EducationILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $20,501 · EducationYESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC: $12,600 · EducationBET YAAKOV OZ VEHADAR INC: $11,800 · EducationHAHAIM YESHIVAT SHALOM INC: $8,700 · EducationYESHIVAT YAGDIL TORAH INC: $5,200 · EducationFRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC: $68,000 · PhilanthropyGEMAH BET YISRAEL INC: $12,500 · PhilanthropySIMHA ORGANIZATION INC: $26,000 · HealthMESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $19,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$4,785,221Human Services$303,500Religion$120,203Education$105,401Philanthropy$80,500Health$26,000Arts & Culture$19,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $303,500 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetSEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC: $99,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC: $68,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC: $46,600 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSIMHA ORGANIZATION INC: $26,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $20,501 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $19,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC: $13,403 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC: $12,600 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGEMAH BET YISRAEL INC: $12,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBRON YESHIVA IN JERUSALEM INC: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBET YAAKOV OZ VEHADAR INC: $11,800 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPEYLIM LEV LACHIM: $10,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED CHILDRENS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHAHAIM YESHIVAT SHALOM INC: $8,700 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTORAH LEARNING RESOURCES LTD: $6,603 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetYESHIVAT YAGDIL TORAH INC: $5,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYeshivat Lev Torah: $4,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $1,001 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC ↗
  • Who funds BET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC ↗
  • Who funds SIMHA ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ILAN HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds GEMAH BET YISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBRON YESHIVA IN JERUSALEM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY45.8× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Setton Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · Cabasso Family Foundation · Mary & Abe Sutton Foundation · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · The Dweck and Rahmey Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Emet Vemunah Sam & Samantha Sasson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Emet Vemunah Sam & Samantha Sasson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Yeshivas Ohr Hatorah Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Bet Yaakov of the Jersey Shore Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Mesorah Heritage Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Emet Vemunah Sam & Samantha Sasson Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Emet Vemunah Sam & Samantha Sasson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Emet Vemunah Sam & Samantha Sasson Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph