Does Elliot J Chehebar Charitable Trust Elliot J Chehebar Trustee accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as Elliot J Chehebar Charitable Trust Elliot J Chehebar Trustee?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc, The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc, The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation.

Elliot J Chehebar Charitable Trust Elliot J Chehebar Trustee

Elliot J Chehebar Charitable Trust Elliot J Chehebar Trustee at a glance Mostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

Elliot J Chehebar Charitable Trust Elliot J Chehebar Trustee

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$14k

Largest

01What it funds

0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Religion$73kEducation$56kPhilanthropy$55kFood & Nutrition$10kYouth Development$7kHuman Services$4kPublic Benefit$4kHealth$1kOther$0

02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k22 grants · $33k
$10k–50k1 grant · $14k

$1,002

Median grant

States reached

$86k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
SHAARE ZION CONGREGATION	$14,450
MISHKAN TORAH	$4,600
CIVIC IMPROVEMENT ASSOCAITION INC	$3,600
THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC	$2,800
SAFE SCHOLARSHIP FUND	$2,500
EDMOND J SAFRA SYNAGOGUE OF DEAL	$2,300
AHAVA BABY	$2,000
SIMHA FOUNDATION	$1,800
DSN COMMUNITY CENTER	$1,800
Individual grant recipient	$1,800
SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC	$1,500
UJA FEDERATION	$1,002
CHAI LIFELINE	$1,001
Individual grant recipient	$1,000
KEREN YOM TOV INC	$1,000

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$91k · 14 repeat orgs$123k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$91k

$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%

+14%

Still filing today

36%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesReligionEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

DS
DEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC
3× · 2021–2024 · $3k · revenue +134%
AB
AHAVA BABY INC
2× · 2023–2024 · $3k · revenue +68%
IH
ILAN HIGH SCHOOL
2× · 2022–2024 · $300 · revenue +30%

Funded once

GY
GESHER YEHUDA INCgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +41%
JF
JACKSON FAMILY CHARITABLE TRUST
one grant, 2021 · $50k
HK
HKY KOL YAAKAB INC
one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +24%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel

Philanthropy

Tal Hashamayim Foundation

Religion

Bais Yehuda Perach Rochel Foundation

Public Benefit

Yad Yosef Foundation

Philanthropy

Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc

Education

Tzemach Yifroch Foundation

—

Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation

Philanthropy

The Yad Moach Vlev Foundation

Philanthropy

Zichron Yeshaya Foundation

—

Zichron Avrohom Yosef

Philanthropy

Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc

Philanthropy

Sherit Isroel

—

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Darche Eres Inc; the most unlike its peers is Simha Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

14/15

Grantees still filing

7/15

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$179,409Food & Nutrition$10,301Youth Development$6,541Philanthropy$5,402Religion$4,800Human Services$3,802Education$3,100Health$1,001

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY37.1× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · Reuben J Chehebar Charitable Trust Reuben J Chehebar Trustee · Ic Hessed Foundation · Ronald and Lillie Ades Foundation · Abraham D & Annette Cohen Foundation · Jack D Cohen Foundation Inc · Albert & Melissa Sutton Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elliot J Chehebar Charitable Trust Elliot J Chehebar Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elliot J Chehebar Charitable Trust Elliot J Chehebar Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Elliot J Chehebar Charitable Trust Elliot J Chehebar Trustee?

Find your warmest path to Elliot J Chehebar Charitable Trust Elliot J Chehebar Trustee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

Play a game based on Elliot J Chehebar Charitable Trust Elliot J Chehebar Trustee’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home