Skip to content

New Hampshire · Private foundation

Ellen V Smith Trust 9th Clause Sch9002

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$81k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
8
Grants FY2025
8
Organizations funded FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$17,000
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$2.3M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$503kYouth Development$12kArts & Culture$5k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
NY
MA
CT
RI
CA
GA
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2024 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Plus 9 recipients with no EIN on record ($90k), not named here.

Compare Ellen V Smith Trust 9th Clause Sch9002 with peer funders

About Ellen V Smith Trust 9th Clause Sch9002

How much does Ellen V Smith Trust 9th Clause Sch9002 give?
Ellen V Smith Trust 9th Clause Sch9002 reported 8 grants totaling $81,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing.
What does Ellen V Smith Trust 9th Clause Sch9002 fund?
By grant dollars over FY2024 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (97%), Youth Development (2%), Arts & Culture (1%).
Who are Ellen V Smith Trust 9th Clause Sch9002's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2024 to FY2025: Citrus County 4-H Association Inc ($12k), Syracuse University ($10k), National University ($10k).
Does Ellen V Smith Trust 9th Clause Sch9002 accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Where is Ellen V Smith Trust 9th Clause Sch9002 based?
Ellen V Smith Trust 9th Clause Sch9002 is based in NH.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ellen V Smith Trust 9th Clause Sch9002’s filings →

More from the funding graph