Skip to content

· Public charity

Ellen E & Victor J Cohn Supporting Foundation

Further the charitable, educational, and religious purposes of the jewish federation of cleveland ("federation").

$244k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$34k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Philanthropy$818kReligion$322kEducation$214kHealth$114kArts & Culture$68kFood & Nutrition$6k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $189,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $243,800 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $54,800 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $165k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$844k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC$34,000
SPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY$33,000
RAINIER SCHOLARS$33,000
HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE$25,000
HEBREW ACADEMY OF CLEVELAND$10,000
ORT AMERICA INC$10,000
MUSICAL ARTS ASSOCIATION$10,000
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$10,000
GILMOUR ACADEMY$8,000
JOSEPH AND FLORENCE MANDEL JEWISH DAY SCHOOL$8,000
GROSS SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FRIENDS OF CHABAD LUBAVITCH SAN DIEGO: $18k → 11%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $34k → 17%HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $36k → 12%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $12k → 15%UNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $6k → 17%RAINIER SCHOLARS: $33k → 9%SPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY: $33k → 17%HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $36k → 12%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $12k → 15%HEBREW ACADEMY OF CLEVELAND: $10k → 17%HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $25k → 12%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $512k → 17%HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $18k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $300k → 17%HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $18k → 12%MENORAH PARK FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%ORT AMERICA INC: $14k → 17%ORT AMERICA INC: $10k → 17%MENORAH PARK FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%MENORAH PARK FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%MENORAH PARK FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%JOSEPH AND FLORENCE MANDEL JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $8k → 17%FAIRMOUNT TEMPLE ANSHE CHESED CONGREGATION: $7k → 17%JOSEPH & FLORENCE MANDEL JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $6k → 17%JOSEPH AND FLORENCE MANDEL JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $6k → 17%GILMOUR ACADEMY: $10k → 17%GILMOUR ACADEMY: $10k → 17%GILMOUR ACADEMY: $8k → 17%NEGEV FOUNDATION: $6k → 17%TEMPLE ISRAEL OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $182k → 17%GROSS SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL: $8k → 17%GROSS SCHECTER DAY SCHOOL: $6k → 17%GROSS SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL: $6k → 17%MUSICAL ARTS ASSOCIATION: $15k → 17%MUSICAL ARTS ASSOCIATION: $10k → 17%MUSICAL ARTS ASSOCIATION: $10k → 17%MUSICAL ARTS ASSOCIATION: $8k → 17%MUSICAL ARTS ASSOCIATION: $8k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $25k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$25k · 100% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT: RECOMMENDED FOR SHARAKA · CLEVELAND CHAPTER - GENERAL SUPPORT

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Ellen E & Victor J Cohn Supporting Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 92% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 59%.

Ellen E & Victor J Cohn Supporting Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 33% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$401k · 8 repeat orgs$318k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$401k
$218k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+45%

Still filing today

88%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureReligionPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FOUR COMMUNITY HILLEL HOUSE DBA HILLEL AT KENT STATE UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2019–2025 · $133k · revenue +44%
  • TM
    The Musical Arts Association
    5× · 2019–2025 · $50k · revenue +39%
  • OS
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2025 · $46k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • TO
    TEMPLEISRAEL OF GREATER CLEVELAND
    one grant, 2022 · $182k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF CHABAD LUBAVITCH SAN DIEGO
    one grant, 2019 · $18k
  • FT
    FAIRMOUNT TEMPLE ANSHE CHESED CONGREGATION
    one grant, 2019 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Judaism Foundation
—
2
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
3
Fuchs Mizrachi Schools

The mission of fuchs mizrachi school is to educate each child in the orthodox jewish religious zionist tradition, imbued with the love of g-d, torah, people and the land of israel.

—
4
The Jewish Foundation of Cincinnati
Philanthropy
5
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
6
Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life At the Penn State University

To enrich the lives of jewish and undergraduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world. penn state hillel's student leaders, professionals, and lay leaders are dedicated to creating a pluralistic, welcoming, and…

—
7
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
8
Abraham Joshua Heschel Day School

Abraham joshua heschel day school cultivates students' natural sense of wonder into an exceptionally rich education that encourages critical thinking, creativity, and compassion. in partnership with our families, we inspire our students to…

—
9
The Laura and Alvin Siegal College of Judaic Studies Educational Foundation

To carry out the charitable, educational, and religious purposes of the jewish federation of cleveland by promoting high quality jewish life-long learning opportunities regarding the study of judaism spiritually, historically, culturally,…

Education
10
Irvine Hebrew Day School

Ihds utilizes a dual general and judaic studies curriculum. the judaic studies curriculum emphasizes the fundamentals of hebrew reading, writing and speaking, jewish history, holidays, jewish values, torah, the jewish life cycle, the land…

—
11
Joann and Thomas Adler Family Foundation

To further the charitable, educational and religious purposes of the jewish federation of cleveland ("federation").

Philanthropy
12
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Menorah Park Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Musical Arts Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $812,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND+1 more: $6,000 · PhilanthropyTEMPLEISRAEL OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $182,000 · OtherTEMPLEISRAEL OF GREATER CLEVE…FOUR COMMUNITY HILLEL HOUSE DBA HILLEL AT KENT STATE UNIVERSITY: $133,000 · OtherFOUR COMMUNITY HILLEL HOUSE D…GILMOUR ACADEMY INC: $28,000 · OtherGILMOUR ACADEMY INCORT AMERICA INC: $24,000 · OtherORT AMERICA INCFRIENDS OF CHABAD LUBAVITCH SAN DIEGO: $17,600 · Other+2 more: $16,600 · OtherOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $46,000 · EducationOHIO STAT…RAINIER SCHOLARS: $33,000 · EducationRAINIER S…SPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INC: $33,000 · EducationSPONSORS …JOSEPH & FLORENCE MANDEL JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $20,000 · EducationJOSEPH & …MENORAH PARK FOUNDATION: $80,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $34,000 · HealthThe Musical Arts Association: $50,000 · Arts & CultureGROSS SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL: $20,000 · ReligionTHE NEGEV FOUNDATION: $6,000 · International
Philanthropy$818,000Other$401,200Education$132,000Health$114,000Arts & Culture$50,000Religion$20,000International$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $812,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFOUR COMMUNITY HILLEL HOUSE DBA HILLEL AT KENT STATE UNIVERSITY: $133,000 over 5y, 6.6% of budgetMENORAH PARK FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetThe Musical Arts Association: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $46,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $34,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAINIER SCHOLARS: $33,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetORT AMERICA INC: $24,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGROSS SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJOSEPH & FLORENCE MANDEL JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHEBREW ACADEMY OF CLEVELAND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEGEV FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ellen E & Victor J Cohn Supporting Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ellen E & Victor J Cohn Supporting Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ellen E & Victor J Cohn Supporting Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ellen E & Victor J Cohn Supporting Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ellen E & Victor J Cohn Supporting’s filings →

    More from the funding graph