Skip to content

· Private foundation

Elizabeth T Heim & Margaret L Rigby

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$389k
Granted FY2026still arriving
11
Grants FY2026still arriving
7
States reached
$97k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$1.3MEducation$749k
02FY2026 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $233k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $156k
$19,457
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAYO CLINIC FOUNDATION$97,286
MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC$58,372
JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL$38,914
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC$38,914
MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER$38,914
GLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION$19,457
MASONIC MEDICAL RESEARCH LAB$19,457
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI-OPHTHALMOLOGY$19,457
THE ARTHRITIS RESEARCH INSTITUTE$19,457
NATIONAL OSTEOPOROSIS FOUNDATION$19,457
NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH$19,457
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 39% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%MAYO CLINIC FOUNDATION: $97k → 9%GLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $19k → 10%MASONIC MEDICAL RESEARCH LAB: $19k → 16%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER: $39k → 17%NATIONAL OSTEOPOROSIS FOUNDATION: $19k → 14%THE ARTHRITIS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $19k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI-OPHTHALMOLOGY: $19k → 15%MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $58k → 9%NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $19k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL: $39k → 19%MAYO FOUNDATION: $85k → 9%GLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $17k → 10%MASONIC MEDICAL RESEARCH LAB: $17k → 16%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER: $34k → 17%NATIONAL OSTEOPOROSIS FOUNDATION: $17k → 14%THE ARTHRITIS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $17k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI-OPHTHALMOLOGY: $17k → 15%MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $51k → 9%NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $17k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $34k → 19%MAYO FOUNDATION: $77k → 9%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER: $31k → 17%MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $46k → 9%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $31k → 19%MAYO FOUNDATION: $65k → 9%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER: $26k → 17%MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $39k → 9%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $26k → 19%MAYO FOUNDATION: $65k → 9%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER: $26k → 17%MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $39k → 9%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $26k → 19%MAYO FOUNDATION: $63k → 9%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER: $25k → 17%MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $38k → 9%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $25k → 19%MAYO FOUNDATION: $58k → 9%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER: $23k → 17%MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $35k → 9%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $23k → 19%MAYO FOUNDATION: $57k → 9%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER: $23k → 17%MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $34k → 9%JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL THE: $23k → 19%MAYO FOUNDATION: $54k → 9%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER: $22k → 17%MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $32k → 9%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $22k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 14 repeat orgs$97k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2026, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
1

Total granted

$2.4M
$97k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $97k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC
    9× · 2018–2026 · $372k · revenue +168%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    9× · 2018–2026 · $248k · revenue +26%
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $186k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • MC
    MAYO CLINIC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2026 · $97k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAYO FOUNDATION: $523,372 · OtherMAYO FOUNDATIONMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $372,395 · OtherMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INCMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER: $248,263 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCERTHE ARTHRITIS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $124,131 · OtherTHE ARTHRITIS RESEARCH INSTITUTENATIONAL OSTEOPOROSIS FOUNDATION: $124,131 · OtherNATIONAL OSTEOPOROSIS FOUNDATIONNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $124,131 · OtherNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCHMAYO CLINIC FOUNDATION: $97,286 · OtherMAYO CLINIC FOUNDATIONMASONIC MEDICAL RESEARCH LAB: $85,311 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI-OPHTHALMOLOGY: $85,311 · OtherAmerican Heart Association Inc: $248,263 · HealthAmerican Heart Associ…GLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $124,131 · HealthGLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOU…THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL: $61,831 · HealthTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOS…MASONIC MEDICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY: $38,820 · HealthMASONIC MEDICAL RESEA…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $186,432 · EducationJOHNS HOPK…University of Miami: $38,820 · EducationUniversity…
Other$1,784,331Health$473,045Education$225,252

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $372,395 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $248,263 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $186,432 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $124,131 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL: $61,831 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMASONIC MEDICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY: $38,820 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $38,820 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds MASONIC MEDICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elizabeth T Heim & Margaret L Rigby funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elizabeth T Heim & Margaret L Rigby. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • The Johns Hopkins Hospital: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Elizabeth T Heim & Margaret L Rigby’s filings →

More from the funding graph