Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Elizabeth Elliot Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Animals$21kCrime & Legal$11kReligion$10kEducation$9kEnvironment$7kPhilanthropy$1k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$934k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SNIP COLLIER INC$10,000
FL SHERIFFS YOUTH$2,000
PAWS OF JACKSON HOLE$2,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$2,000
MARY INSTITUTE$2,000
FL SHERIFFS ASSOC$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 55% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%BARNARD COLLEGE: $2k → 17%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $2k → 14%SNIP COLLIER INC: $10k → 10%FL SHERIFFS YOUTH: $2k → 19%MARY INSTITUTE: $2k → 11%WYOMING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%BENNINGTON COLLEGE: $1k → 11%BARNARD COLLEGE: $1k → 17%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $2k → 14%NAPLES ZOO: $1k → 10%FL SHERIFFS YOUTH: $2k → 19%MARY INSTITUTE: $2k → 11%BENNINGTON COLLEGE: $1k → 11%BARNARD COLLEGE: $1k → 17%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $2k → 14%NAPLES ZOO: $1k → 10%FL SHERIFFS YOUTH: $1k → 19%MARY INSTITUTE: $2k → 11%BENNINGTON COLLEGE: $1k → 11%BARNARD COLLEGE: $1k → 17%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $1k → 14%NAPLES ZOO: $1k → 10%FL SHERIFFS ASSOC: $1k → 19%MARY INSTITUTE: $2k → 11%BENNINGTON COLLEGE: $1k → 11%FL SHERIFFS ASSOC: $1k → 19%MARY INSTITUTE: $2k → 11%FL SHERIFFS YOUTH: $1k → 19%FL SHERIFFS ASSOC: $1k → 19%FL SHERIFFS ASSOC: $1k → 19%FL SHERIFFS ASSOC: $500 → 19%FL SHERIFFS YOUTH: $500 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$48k · 8 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
1

Total granted

$48k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
0%

Still filing today

63%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEducationEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PAWS - PROVIDING ANIMAL WELFARE SERVICES
    4× · 2021–2024 · $8k · revenue +86%
  • BARNARD COLLEGE
    4× · 2020–2023 · $5k · revenue +48%
  • BC
    BENNINGTON COLLEGE CORPORATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $4k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • SNIP Collier Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SNIP Collier Inc — $10,000 · AnimalsSNIP Collier IncPAWS - PROVIDING ANIMAL WELFARE SERVICES — $8,000 · AnimalsPAWS - PROVIDING ANIMAL WELFARE SERVICESNAPLES ZOO INC — $3,000 · AnimalsNAPLES ZOO INCMARY INSTITUTE — $10,000 · OtherMARY INSTITUTEFL SHERIFFS YOUTH — $6,500 · OtherFL SHERIFFS YOUTHFL SHERIFFS ASSOC — $4,500 · OtherFL SHERIFFS ASSOCBARNARD COLLEGE — $5,000 · EducationBARNARD COLLEGEBENNINGTON COLLEGE CORPORATION — $4,000 · EducationBENNINGTON COLLEG…WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $7,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIF…WYOMING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Philanthropy
Animals$21,000Other$21,000Education$9,000Environment$7,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSNIP Collier Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPAWS - PROVIDING ANIMAL WELFARE SERVICES — $8,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBARNARD COLLEGE — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBENNINGTON COLLEGE CORPORATION — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES ZOO INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWYOMING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SNIP Collier Inc
  • Who funds PAWS - PROVIDING ANIMAL WELFARE SERVICES
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
  • Who funds BARNARD COLLEGE
  • Who funds BENNINGTON COLLEGE CORPORATION
  • Who funds NAPLES ZOO INC
  • Who funds WYOMING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Elizabeth Elliot Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Bennington College Corporation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Elizabeth Elliot Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Elizabeth Elliot Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph