Skip to content
Elderly Housing Dev & Operations at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Elderly Housing Dev & Operations

The purpose of the organization is to provide management of the day-to-day activities of housing projects that are regulated by the department of housing & urban development (hud) and sponsorships with housing projects.

$19k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$908kHealth$144kArts & Culture$102kCommunity Improvement$97kPublic Safety & Disaster$46kReligion$40kHuman Services$25kInternational$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $15,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $18,784 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $3,784 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$68M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ROGERSON COMMUNITIES INC: $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
MD
NM
AR
TN
DC
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

17%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$234k · 4 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
53

Total granted

$234k
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+7%

Still filing today

100%
74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterInternationalHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PL
    PALERMO LAKES INC
    2× · 2018–2023 · $58k · revenue +26%
  • ES
    EHDOC SHAKER BLVD INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $56k · revenue +1%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $55k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • 1B
    1809 BRICKELL LP
    one grant, 2023 · $79k
  • SC
    SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF CHICAGO
    one grant, 2023 · $78k · revenue +8%
  • ED
    EHDOC DEVELOPMENT SERVICES LLC
    one grant, 2021 · $72k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tex Elderly Housing Inc
—
2
Emerald Coast Housing Corporation

The organization provide affordable senior housing

Housing & Shelter
3
Hsc No 5 Housing Development Fu Company Inc

Provide low income housing for the eldery.

Housing & Shelter
4
Lowell Area Housing Inc Dba Schneider Manor
—
5
Dependable Community Development Corporation

To provide housing for the elderly

Human Services
6
Eastwood Senior Housing Inc

Low income housing for the elderly.

Housing & Shelter
7
Helping Hands for the Elderly & Handicapped Society Corporation

Help elderly and handicapped persons maintain their homes property

—
8
Norfolk Senior Housing Corporation

Low and moderate income elderly housing

—
9
West Oaks Ii Corporation
—
10
Antioch Englewood Associates Ltd

Low income housing

Human Services
11
Woodward Senior Citizens Housing Inc

To provided low rent housing for elderly and /or disabled residents.

—
12
Habitat Community Housing Development Inc

Development of affordable housing

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Senior Citizens Housing Dev Corporation of Stonington; the most unlike its peers is United States Fund for Unicef. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/44
Grantees still filing
33/44
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

1809 BRICKELL LP: $78,937 · Other1809 BRICKELL LPEHDOC DEVELOPMENT SERVICES LLC: $71,556 · OtherEHDOC DEVELOPMENT SERVICES LLCJACK KENNY MEMORIAL HOUSING DEV FUND CORP: $65,775 · OtherJACK KENNY MEMORIAL HOUSING DEV FUND CORPEHDOC PEPPER TOWERS LP: $61,583 · OtherEHDOC PEPPER TOWERS LPEHDOC COUNCIL TOWERS LP: $61,277 · OtherEHDOC COUNCIL TOWERS LPALLAPATTAH RESIDENTIAL LP: $58,329 · OtherALLAPATTAH RESIDENTIAL LPEHDOC DINO PAPAVERO LP: $39,509 · OtherEHDOC DINO PAPAVERO LPEHDOC NORTH PARK VILLAGE LP: $38,769 · OtherEHDOC NORTH PARK VILLAGE LPEHDOC SENIOR APTS I LP: $32,516 · OtherEHDOC MAYFIELD MANOR LP: $28,214 · OtherRETIRED STEELWORKERS HOUSING & HEALTH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $26,035 · OtherLAS BRISAS TRACE LP: $25,603 · Other+9 more: $129,003 · Other+9 moreSENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF CHICAGO: $78,041 · Housing & ShelterSENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATI…PALERMO LAKES INC: $57,661 · Housing & ShelterPALERMO LAKES INCEHDOC SHAKER BLVD INC: $55,983 · Housing & ShelterEHDOC SHAKER BLVD INCSENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY: $36,143 · Housing & ShelterSENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATI…SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT: $32,509 · Housing & ShelterSENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING DEVELOPMENTNORTH DADE SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC: $23,661 · Housing & ShelterBAYAMON SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING COMPANY INC: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterEVANGELINE COUNCIL HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY INC: $19,523 · Housing & Shelter+24 more: $238,414 · Housing & Shelter+24 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $55,000 · HealthUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $20,662 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $16,004 · InternationalROGERSON COMMUNITIES INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$717,106Housing & Shelter$561,935Health$55,000International$36,666Human Services$25,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF CHICAGO: $78,041 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetJACK KENNY MEMORIAL HOUSING DEV FUND CORP: $65,775 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetPALERMO LAKES INC: $57,661 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetEHDOC SHAKER BLVD INC: $55,983 over 2y, 10% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY: $36,143 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT: $32,509 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetRETIRED STEELWORKERS HOUSING & HEALTH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $26,035 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetROGERSON COMMUNITIES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNORTH DADE SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC: $23,661 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $20,662 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAYAMON SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING COMPANY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetEVANGELINE COUNCIL HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY INC: $19,523 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF LOS ANGELES: $17,589 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetJACKSONVILLE TOWERS INC: $17,410 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT OF CLAREMONT INC: $17,185 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING DEV CORPORATION OF STONINGTON: $16,321 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $16,004 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLA MAISON ACADIENNE INC: $15,161 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNCSCUSA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP: $13,185 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS HSG DEVELOP CORP OF WASHINGTON: $11,789 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNCSCUSA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP TWO: $10,710 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING DEVELOP CORP OF VILLE PLATTE: $10,710 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetPINE GROVE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10,538 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL LOW INCOME HOUSING COALITION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF BELL: $9,458 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetNATIONAL STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS COMURBDEVCO OF CANTON TWOINC: $9,379 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS HSG DEV CORP OF BOSTON INC: $8,983 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCHATEAU CUSHNOC INC: $8,868 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS HSG DEVELOP CORP OF MT LEBANON: $8,652 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS HSG DEV CORP SOUTH BOSTON INC: $8,592 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPOF STEUBEN CNTY TWO INC: $8,551 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetMAMOU ELDERLY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $7,572 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetEHDOC TEAMSTERS RESIDENCES INC: $7,357 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetJOHN MARVIN TOWER: $6,825 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetNCSCUSA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP THREE INC: $6,800 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetEDWARD ROMERO TERRACE: $6,551 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetJACKSONVILLE GARDENS INC: $6,416 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetVERNON SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5,938 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMMIII INC: $5,335 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elderly Housing Dev & Operations funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elderly Housing Dev & Operations. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 360%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Rogerson Communities Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
36get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Elderly Housing Dev & Operations?

Find your warmest path to Elderly Housing Dev & Operations through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Elderly Housing Dev & Operations’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home