Skip to content

· Public charity

El Paso Veterinary Medical Association

The EL PASO VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION is dedicated to the advancement of animal health.

$218k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$82k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Animals$1.5MEducation$25kPhilanthropy$10k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $205,918, the rows itemized in this filing. The $217,735 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $11,817 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $149k
$29,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EL PASO ANIM URG CARE WEST$82,004
VETERINARY CARE CTRS TEXAS$66,520
VISTA HILLS ANIMAL HOSPITAL$29,500
NORTH HILLS VETERINARY HOSPIT$16,468
TLC ANIMAL HOSPITAL$11,426
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 19%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 19%TLC ANIMAL HOSPITAL: $284k → 21%ZOETIS: $13k → 4%IDEXX LABS: $66k → 7%EL PASO ANIMAL URG CARE: $104k → 21%TLC ANIMAL HOSPITAL: $70k → 21%EL PASO ANIM URG CARE WEST: $82k → 21%MC RAE ANIMAL HOSPITAL: $8k → 21%TLC ANIMAL HOSPITAL: $11k → 21%EL PASO ANIMAL URG CARE WEST: $49k → 21%FAR EAST ANIMAL CARE CENTER: $42k → 21%FAR EAST ANIMAL CARE CENTER: $22k → 21%HUMANE SOCIETY OF EL PASO: $6k → 21%THE VET CARE CTRS OF TEXAS: $242k → 21%THE VET CARE CTRS OF TEXAS: $143k → 21%EASTWOOD ANIMAL CLINIC: $89k → 21%EAST EL PASO ANIMAL HOSPITAL: $76k → 21%VETERINARY CARE CTRS TEXAS: $67k → 21%EASTWOOD ANIMAL CLINIC: $21k → 21%VISTA HILLS ANIMAL HOSPITAL: $61k → 21%EL PASO ANIMAL EMERGENCY CTR: $18k → 21%VISTA HILLS ANIMAL HOSPITAL: $30k → 21%NORTH HILLS VETERINARY HOSPIT: $16k → 21%EL PASO ANIMAL EMERGENCY CTR: $12k → 21%ALLSTAR ANIMAL HOSPITAL: $6k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 6 repeat orgs$517k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
9

Total granted

$1.0M
$352k

Still filing today

0%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $165k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TV
    THE VET CARE CTRS OF TEXAS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $385k
  • TA
    TLC ANIMAL HOSPITAL
    3× · 2023–2025 · $365k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2024 · $110k

Funded once

  • EP
    EL PASO ANIMAL URG CARE
    one grant, 2024 · $104k
  • EE
    EAST EL PASO ANIMAL HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2024 · $76k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $66k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
1/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE VET CARE CTRS OF TEXAS: $385,196 · OtherTHE VET CARE CTRS OF TEXASTLC ANIMAL HOSPITAL: $364,778 · OtherTLC ANIMAL HOSPITALIndividual grant recipient: $110,391 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEL PASO ANIMAL URG CARE: $104,396 · OtherEL PASO ANIMAL URG CAREVISTA HILLS ANIMAL HOSPITAL: $90,482 · OtherVISTA HILLS ANIMAL HOSPITALEL PASO ANIM URG CARE WEST: $82,004 · OtherEL PASO ANIM URG CARE WESTEAST EL PASO ANIMAL HOSPITAL: $75,620 · OtherVETERINARY CARE CTRS TEXAS: $66,520 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $66,237 · OtherFAR EAST ANIMAL CARE CENTER: $63,578 · Other+6 more: $121,628 · Other+6 moreTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EducationEL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyHUMANE SOCIETY OF EL PASO INC: $5,500 · Animals
Other$1,530,830Education$25,000Philanthropy$20,000Animals$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF EL PASO INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF EL PASO INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization El Paso Veterinary Medical Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from El Paso Veterinary Medical Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to El Paso Veterinary Medical Association?

    Find your warmest path to El Paso Veterinary Medical Association through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on El Paso Veterinary Medical Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph