Skip to content

· Private foundation

Egbert Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$27k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Benefit$153kRecreation & Sports$39kPublic Safety & Disaster$29kEducation$21kHuman Services$9kArts & Culture$5kInternational$2kReligion$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$3,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$542k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF TROY$15,000
TROY VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SERVICE$5,000
TROY FIRE AUXILIARY$3,500
KOOTENAI WINTER SPORTS SKI EDUCATIO$2,500
FRAN AND KATIE'S GIVING TREE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 8%LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 8%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 16%PEACE HOUSE: $1k → 5%CAMP PATRIOT: $2k → 17%CAMP PATRIOT: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$217k · 10 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
10

Total granted

$217k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+43%

Still filing today

40%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER
    3× · 2018–2020 · $17k · revenue +63%
  • CW
    CYPRESS WOODLANDS JUNIOR FORUM
    3× · 2019–2022 · $3k · revenue +72%
  • Living Water International
    2× · 2019–2020 · $2k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • TP
    TROY PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • KW
    KOOTENAI WINTER SPORTS SKI EDUCATION FOUNDATIONINC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +11%
  • KW
    KOOTENAI WINTER SPORTS SKI
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Accessible Alpine Adventure Tours
Health
2
The Christmas Box International

The christmas box international partners with local, national and international communities and groups to prevent child abuse and to improve the quality of life for children, teens and young adults who have been abused, neglected or are…

Community Improvement
3
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—
4
The International Water Ski Racing Association Inc
Recreation & Sports
5
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
6
The Center for Women and Children in Crisis

Provide a caring, advocating, safe, and educationally based environment for survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault.

Health
7
Vail International Pro Am
Recreation & Sports
8
Kimbell Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
9
The Road Home

The primary mission is to help individuals and families step out of homelessness and back into the community in salt lake county. the road home meets this mission by providing housing-focused, emergency shelter programs, along with…

Human Services
10
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
11
New Hope Crisis Center of Box Elder County

Providing assistance to those affected by domestic violence or in need of other social services.

—
12
Youth Crisis Center

Crisis mission: to provide temporary care and shelter for abused, abandoned or neglected children long term mission: to provide a residency program for children without a stable home.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Ability Center; the most unlike its peers is Kootenai Winter Sports Ski Education Foundationinc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF TROY: $152,794 · OtherCITY OF TROYTROY VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SERVICE: $20,000 · OtherTROY VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SERVICETROY PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT: $10,000 · OtherTROY FIRE AUXILIARY: $8,500 · OtherKOOTENAI WINTER SPORTS SKI: $7,500 · Other+7 more: $26,000 · Other+7 moreNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $16,500 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL AB…KOOTENAI WINTER SPORTS SKI EDUCATION FOUNDATIONINC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsKOOTENAI WI…CAMP PATRIOT CORP: $2,700 · Human ServicesLiving Water International: $2,000 · Human ServicesPeace House Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $1,000 · Human ServicesALLEY THEATRE: $5,000 · Arts & CultureKimball Art Center: $250 · Arts & Culture
Other$224,794Recreation & Sports$26,500Human Services$6,700Arts & Culture$5,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $16,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALLEY THEATRE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCYPRESS WOODLANDS JUNIOR FORUM: $3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCAMP PATRIOT CORP: $2,700 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLiving Water International: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPeace House Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKimball Art Center: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds KOOTENAI WINTER SPORTS SKI EDUCATION FOUNDATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds ALLEY THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds CYPRESS WOODLANDS JUNIOR FORUM ↗
  • Who funds CAMP PATRIOT CORP ↗
  • Who funds Living Water International ↗
  • Who funds Peace House Inc ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds Kimball Art Center ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Egbert Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Egbert Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Egbert Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph