Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edwill B Miller Trust Uw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$143k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$260kEducation$247kHousing & Shelter$138kReligion$73kHuman Services$55kYouth Development$49kPublic Safety & Disaster$37kPhilanthropy$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $83k
$5,378
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YORK HEALTH FOUNDATION$20,167
MASONIC VILLAGES OF THE GRAND LODGE$20,167
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$16,133
LEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE$13,444
YORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA$13,444
Individual grant recipient$8,067
YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION$6,722
BETHANY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$6,722
EDWILL AND RACHEL MILLER CHARITABLE FUND$6,722
WELLSPAN VNA HOME CARE$5,378
LEO FIRE COMPANY #1$5,378
RED LION YOUTH CENTER$5,378
STEWARTSTOWN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$4,033
KALTREIDER BENFER LIBRARY$2,689
DREAMWRIGHTS CENTER FOR$1,420
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%OLIVIA'S HOUSE: $972 → 9%HOUSE OF HOPE YORK PA: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$936k · 22 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
8

Total granted

$936k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+14%

Still filing today

45%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterAnimalsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MV
    MASONIC VILLAGES OF THE GRAND LODGE OF PENNSYLVANIA
    6× · 2020–2025 · $138k · revenue +14%
  • YH
    YORK HEALTH FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $138k · revenue +11%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    6× · 2020–2025 · $110k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • YC
    YORK COUNTY LIBRARIES &
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • HO
    HOUSE OF HOPE YORK PA
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +12%
  • NL
    NEW LIFE CENTER FOR MOTHERS
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wesley Family Services

To empower children, adults and families by providing transformational quality whole person care.

Human Services
2
Bethesda Children's Home

Bethesda's vision is to fulfill the social, emotional, spiritual, and behavioral health needs of children, families, and individuals by providing an effective and efficient continuum of care in a quality focused environment.

Human Services
3
York Hospital

York hospital is a premier community teaching hospital providing quality, cost-effective health care services strongly supporting excellence in education, and offering essential services without regard for an individual's ability to pay.

Health
4
The Lancaster County Partners for Youth
Philanthropy
5
Elwyn of Pennsylvania and Delaware

Elwyn makes life better for people with developmental and behavioral health challenges.

Human Services
6
The Young Women's Christian Association of York Pa

Ywca york is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

—
7
Highmark Health Group

Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

—
8
Philhaven

Philhaven promotes hope, healing and wholeness through the provision of behavioral resources.

Health
9
New York Institute for Special Education

The mission of the new york institute for special education is to provide quality educational programs and support to students and families in a safe caring environment to awaken and inspire student curiosity, lifelong learning and…

Education
10
Youth Enrichment Services Inc

Youth enrichment services, inc. was founded in 1994 for the purpose of providing at-risk teens and low-income families residing in allegheny county a comprehensive in-home peer mentoring program, juvenile alternative to detention,…

Human Services
11
Dr Gertrude a Barber Center Inc

We "make dreams come true." we provide children and adults with autism, intellectual/developmental disabilities and behavioral health challenges and their families the education, services and resources needed to be self-reliant,…

Human Services
12
Crispus Attucks Association of York Pa

The crispus attucks association of york, pennsylvania is a comprehensive non-profit entity that provides education services, human services, community development and affordable housing that enhances the quality of life for a diverse…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leadership York; the most unlike its peers is Kaltreider-Benfer Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $55,023 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $45,851 · OtherYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONBETHANY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $45,851 · OtherBETHANY UNITED METHODIST CHURCHWELLSPAN VNA HOME CARE: $36,681 · OtherWELLSPAN VNA HOME CARERED LION YOUTH CENTER: $36,681 · OtherRED LION YOUTH CENTERLEO FIRE COMPANY #1: $36,681 · OtherLEO FIRE COMPANY #1STEWARTSTOWN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $27,510 · OtherSTEWARTSTOWN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHEDWILL AND RACHEL MILLER CHARITABLE FUND: $19,952 · OtherEDWILL AND RACHEL MILLER CHARITABLE FUNDKALTREIDER-BENFER LIBRARY: $18,342 · Other+10 more: $32,048 · Other+10 moreYORK HEALTH FOUNDATION: $137,554 · HealthYORK HEALTH FOUNDATIONSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $110,044 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDR…+2 more: $2,392 · HealthLEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE: $91,703 · EducationLEBANON VALLEY COLLEGEYORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $91,703 · EducationYORK COLLEGE OF PENNSY…MARTIN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION: $6,962 · EducationMASONIC VILLAGES OF THE GRAND LODGE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $137,554 · Housing & ShelterMASONIC VILLAGES…LEG UP FARM INC: $9,892 · AnimalsHOUSE OF HOPE YORK PA: $1,000 · Human ServicesOLIVIA'S HOUSE - A GRIEF AND LOSS CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $972 · Human ServicesLEADERSHIP YORK: $1,800 · Public Benefit
Other$354,620Health$249,990Education$190,368Housing & Shelter$137,554Animals$9,892Human Services$1,972Public Benefit$1,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMASONIC VILLAGES OF THE GRAND LODGE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $137,554 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYORK HEALTH FOUNDATION: $137,554 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $110,044 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE: $91,703 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $91,703 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRED LION YOUTH CENTER: $36,681 over 6y, 16% of budgetKALTREIDER-BENFER LIBRARY: $18,342 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetLEG UP FARM INC: $9,892 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMARTIN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION: $6,962 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetLEADERSHIP YORK: $1,800 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSUSAN P BYRNES HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC: $1,420 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSE OF HOPE YORK PA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ARC OF YORK COUNTY INC: $972 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOLIVIA'S HOUSE - A GRIEF AND LOSS CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $972 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHEATRE ARTS FOR EVERYONE: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MASONIC VILLAGES OF THE GRAND LODGE OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds YORK HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds LEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds YORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds RED LION YOUTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds KALTREIDER-BENFER LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds LEG UP FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds MARTIN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP YORK ↗
  • Who funds SUSAN P BYRNES HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF HOPE YORK PA ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF YORK COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds W E L L ↗
  • Who funds OLIVIA'S HOUSE - A GRIEF AND LOSS CENTER FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds THEATRE ARTS FOR EVERYONE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of York CountyPA22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of York County · York County Community Foundation · Kinsley Foundation · Airie Knipel Harry V and J William Warehime Foundation · The Stewart Foundation · White Rose Leadership Institute · The Arthur J and Lee R Glatfelter Foundation · Rice Family Foundation · Powder Mill Foundation · Rachel H Miller Trust Iuw · Edwill B & Rachel H Miller Trust · Bob Hoffman Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edwill B Miller Trust Uw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edwill B Miller Trust Uw. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Edwill B Miller Trust Uw’s filings →

More from the funding graph