Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edith C Blum Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$525k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$3.4MHuman Services$200kPhilanthropy$125kInternational$115kEducation$25kAnimals$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $450k
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NCCN FOUNDATION$200,000
CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE$100,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$100,000
JEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR SERVICES FOR THE AGED$50,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS (FBA LIROT)$35,000
BLOOD CANCER FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN$25,000
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY DEPT OF OPHTHALMOLOGY (GLAUCOMA FUND)$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $200k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%JEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR SERVICES FOR THE AGED: $50k → 17%JEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR SERVICES FOR THE AGED: $50k → 17%JEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR SERVICES FOR THE AGED: $50k → 17%JEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR SERVICES FOR THE AGED: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 12 repeat orgs$160k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against -30% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
7

Total granted

$3.7M
$135k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
-30%

Still filing today

50%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +47%
  • CR
    CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $400k · revenue +5%
  • TJ
    THE JEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR SERVICES FOR THE AGED
    4× · 2022–2025 · $200k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • AM
    AMERICAN MODELING TEACHERS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -30%
  • CU
    COLUMBIA U DEPT OF OPHTHALMOLOGY (GLAUCOMA FUND)
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • GF
    GREAT FALLS CLINIC LEGACY
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
2
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
5
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
6
Imagine a Cure Cancer Treatment
Health
7
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
8
Aveni Foundation

The aveni foundation is committed to expediting development of gene-targeted therapies for metastatic cancers and other unmet medical needs.

Health
9
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
10
Cancer Research and Biostatistics

To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.

Health
11
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

—
12
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Modeling Teachers Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,650,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $400,000 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INCNCCN FOUNDATION: $350,000 · HealthNCCN FOUNDATION+2 more: $95,000 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $580,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANC…PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS (FBA LIROT): $125,000 · OtherPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS (F…PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS (FBA SOROKA MEDICAL CENTER): $100,000 · OtherPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS (F…PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS (FBA CYSTIC FIBROSIS FDN OF ISRAEL): $50,000 · OtherPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS (FBA EMEK MEDICAL CENTER): $45,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY DEPT OF OPHTHALMOLOGY (GLAUCOMA FUND): $40,000 · Other+4 more: $80,000 · Other+4 moreTHE JEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR SERVICES FOR THE AGED: $200,000 · Human ServicesNMDP FOUNDATION: $85,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN MODELING TEACHERS ASSOCIATION: $25,000 · EducationKEREN OR INC: $20,000 · EducationBORDER ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $10,000 · Animals
Health$2,495,000Other$1,020,000Human Services$200,000Philanthropy$85,000Education$45,000Animals$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,650,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $400,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNCCN FOUNDATION: $350,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetTHE JEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR SERVICES FOR THE AGED: $200,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNMDP FOUNDATION: $85,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN MODELING TEACHERS ASSOCIATION: $25,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S LEUKEMIA FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN: $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetKEREN OR INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBORDER ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds NCCN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR SERVICES FOR THE AGED ↗
  • Who funds NMDP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN MODELING TEACHERS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S LEUKEMIA FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds KEREN OR INC ↗
  • Who funds BORDER ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edith C Blum Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edith C Blum Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Edith C Blum’s filings →

More from the funding graph