Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Economic Development Alliance of St Clair County

The economic development alliance of st.

$2.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Environment$1.7MArts & Culture$515kCommunity Improvement$121kHealth$38kRecreation & Sports$16kPublic Benefit$12kHousing & Shelter$11kHuman Services$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 16 grants below total $1,820,655 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,514,854 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $694,199 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $62k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $122k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.6M
$9,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF ST CLAIR$1,637,502
FISHBECK THOMPSON CARR & HUBER INC$35,430
Individual grant recipient$27,200
BARR ENGINEERING MICHIGAN LLC$25,509
CITY OF PORT HURON$12,000
BEADLE BAY MARINA & CAMPGROUND$10,965
Individual grant recipient$10,535
AMERICANA MANUFACTURING COMPANY LLC$9,500
B&B SALES AND SERVICES INC$9,325
GREAT LAKES KENNEL$8,614
ELK ST BREWERY$7,182
CAMPBELLS CREEKSIDE FARM LLC$5,500
ON-TARGET PRECISION SERVICES$5,500
THE BLUE LOTUS POTTERY LLC$5,475
FITNESS COLISEUM$5,347
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BARR ENGINEERING MICHIGAN LLC: $26k → 11%AMERICANA MANUFACTURING COMPANY LLC: $10k → 10%FISHBECK THOMPSON CARR & HUBER INC: $35k → 11%GREAT LAKES KENNEL: $9k → 12%THE BLUE LOTUS POTTERY LLC: $5k → 12%AR ENGINEERING: $27k → 12%BTM COMPANY: $6k → 13%APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL: $11k → 14%RENE'S INCORPORATED: $8k → 14%PORT AUSTIN MARINA LLC: $6k → 12%ON-TARGET PRECISION SERVICES: $6k → 12%CITY OF ST CLAIR: $1.6M → 13%ELK ST BREWERY: $7k → 14%B&B SALES AND SERVICES INC: $9k → 12%CAMPBELLS CREEKSIDE FARM LLC: $6k → 12%RENE'S INCORPORATED: $7k → 13%BEADLE BAY MARINA & CAMPGROUND: $11k → 12%FITNESS COLISEUM: $5k → 12%SOUTH OF HEAVEN BEVERAGE CO: $7k → 13%DABBLE: $5k → 12%RIVERBANK THEATRE: $500k → 13%CITY OF PORT HURON: $12k → 13%CM AND DT LLC: $10k → 13%EVERYTHING CLASSIC ANTIQUES AND MORE: $10k → 13%IMMEDIPAY INC: $10k → 13%GOABEACH LLC: $10k → 13%BLUE WATER COPACKING LLC: $10k → 13%TEQUILA LLC: $10k → 13%IMMEDIPAY INC: $8k → 13%BOWMAN PRINTING: $10k → 13%HARDER'S CITY LIMITS: $8k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
0/1
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CITY OF ST CLAIR — $1,637,502 · OtherCITY OF ST CLAIR+28 more — $301,453 · Other+28 moreRIVERBANK YOUTH THEATRE — $500,000 · Arts & CultureRIVERBANK YOUTH THEATRE
Other$1,938,955Arts & Culture$500,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRIVERBANK YOUTH THEATRE — $500,000 over 1y, 14% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RIVERBANK YOUTH THEATRE

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Economic Development Alliance of St Clair County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph