Skip to content

· Public charity

Early Years Inc

Early years leads efforts to strengthen accessible and affordable quality early care and education by providing support for families, communities and the workforce.

$28M
Granted FY2025still arriving
103
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$684k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$55MEducation$17MFood & Nutrition$5.4MPhilanthropy$955kPublic Benefit$847kCommunity Improvement$418kHealth$381kYouth Development$174kOther$0
02FY2025 · 103 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 103 grants below total $11,528,482, the rows itemized in this filing. The $28,495,335 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $16,966,853 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $140k
  • $10k–50k48 grants · $1.1M
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $2.1M
  • $250k+19 grants · $8.2M
$27,857
Median grant
4
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS DBA HILLANDALE ELEM PREK$684,113
ASKORP INC DBA PRIMARY COLORS EARLY LEARNING CENTER$605,521
CHILDCARE NETWORK #57$569,052
FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES RISING INC DBA LEATHERS MEACHEM HEADSTART$557,717
PERMO CORPORATION DBA KIDS R KIDS RTP$545,882
CHILDREN'S CAMPUS SOUTHPOINT$524,345
MARTIN-PITT PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN$457,502
SOUTHWESTERN CHILD DEV COM$438,831
ANB EARLY CARE AND EDUCATION LLC$437,529
CHILD CARE RESOURCES INC$422,405
RANDYS FIVE STAR ACADEMY INC$421,287
WHITE ROCK CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER$366,461
SOUTHEASTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE$365,369
ALBEMARLE ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES$341,049
CREATIVE SCHOOLS INC$309,011
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WORK FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $167k → 15%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREENSBORO INC: $5k → 16%WORK FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $153k → 15%WORK FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $29k → 15%WORK FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $28k → 15%HIGHER CALLING MINISTRIES AND CHILD CARE INC: $6k → 8%CHILD CARE MATTERS INC: $28k → 13%CHILD CARE MATTERS INC: $22k → 13%CHILD CARE MATTERS INC: $12k → 13%CHILD CARE MATTERS INC: $11k → 13%CHILD CARE MATTERS INC: $11k → 13%ALL MY CHILDREN FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $191k → 11%ALL MY CHILDREN FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $179k → 11%ALL MY CHILDREN FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $137k → 11%ALL MY CHILDREN FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $116k → 11%ALL MY CHILDREN FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $80k → 11%ALL MY CHILDREN FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $80k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
MA
OR
NV
CA
DE
NC
SC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Early Years Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Early Years Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$79M · 188 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

188 repeat relationships: 89 still active in FY2025, 99 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

188
45

Total granted

$79M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+34%

Still filing today

12%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $146k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MP
    MARTIN PITT PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.6M · revenue +18%
  • FA
    FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES RISING INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +18%
  • DOWN EAST PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • EY
    EARLY YEARS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $438k · revenue +92%
  • UO
    University of North Carolina at Wilmington - College of Health & Human Serv
    one grant, 2017 · $115k
  • PI
    PBLA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $107k · revenue +155%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Partnership for Children of Cumberland County Inc

The partnership's mission is to be the driving force to engage partners to achieve lasting positive outcomes for all children, beginning at birth.

Education
2
Onslow County Partnership for Children

When they have challenges, we connect all children and their families to programs and resources that provide opportunities and hope.

Education
3
Guilford County Partnership for Children Inc

The Guilford County Partnership for Children is a local non-profit strategically directing Smart Start and NC Pre-K funding to ensure equitable access to high quality childcare, professional development for early childhood educators and…

Education
4
Nek Community Growth Center

Education of childcare workers

Education
5
Denton City-County Day School

Denton City County Day School provides quality, affordable childcareto families in Denton County. Our mission is to provide qualitypre-kindergarten education and loving care to children ages 2 through 5 years. Our vision is that all DCCDS…

Human Services
6
Small People Child Development Center

The Small People Child Development Center is organized to provide early childhood education, care, and developmental services to infants, toddlers, and preschool-aged children. The organization supports working families by offering a safe,…

Human Services
7
Child Care Center of First Presbyterian Church Inc

To provide quality child care for working parents in Western North Carolina.

Human Services
8
Surry County Early Childhood Partnership

For the future health and vitality of Surry County, the mission of the Surry County Early Childhood Partnership is to take action on behalf of the people of Surry County to support children 0 to 5 and their families through partnerships…

Education
9
North Carolina Association for the Education of Young Children

Ncaeyc promotes high-quality early learning for all children, birth through age 8, by connecting practice, policy, and research. we advance a diverse, dynamic early childhood profession and support all who care for, educate, and work on…

—
10
Early Partners

Early learning centers sponsored by employers provide care for a diverse group of children six weeks to four years old near parents workplace

Education
11
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
12
Community Child Care Center

To promote each child's development by providing high quality early childhood education.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Care Resources Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pbla Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 246 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
24/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDCARE NETWORK INC: $5,985,931 · OtherCHILDCARE NETWORK INCASKORP INC: $5,575,917 · OtherASKORP INCSOUTHWESTERN CHILD DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION INC: $3,783,080 · OtherSOUTHWESTERN CHILD DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION INCCHILD CARE RESOURCES INC: $3,568,486 · OtherSoutheastern Community College: $3,462,673 · OtherDURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $3,192,467 · OtherBRYSON CHRISTIAN MONTESSORI: $2,393,233 · Other+174 more: $39,886,341 · Other+174 moreMARTIN PITT PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC: $3,572,994 · EducationMARTIN PITT …DOWN EAST PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN: $2,005,826 · EducationDOWN EAST PA…ALBEMARLE ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $1,975,538 · EducationALBEMARLE AL…DURHAM'S PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN: $469,138 · EducationDURHAM'S PAR…RANDOLPH COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC: $404,073 · Education+7 more: $367,537 · EducationFAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES RISING INC: $2,277,249 · Philanthropy+1 more: $20,000 · PhilanthropyALL MY CHILDREN FAMILY RESOURCE CTR: $783,191 · Human ServicesWORK FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC DBA CHILD CARE RESOURCE CENTER: $376,810 · Human ServicesCHILDCARE MATTERS INC: $84,446 · Human ServicesPBLA INC: $106,849 · Youth DevelopmentDISPUTE SETTLEMENT CENTER INC: $26,635 · Crime & Legal
Other$67,848,128Education$8,795,106Philanthropy$2,297,249Human Services$1,244,447Youth Development$106,849Crime & Legal$26,635

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHWESTERN CHILD DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION INC: $3,783,080 over 9y, 5.1% of budgetMARTIN PITT PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC: $3,572,994 over 9y, 21% of budgetCHILD CARE RESOURCES INC: $3,568,486 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetFAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES RISING INC: $2,277,249 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetDOWN EAST PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN: $2,005,826 over 9y, 4.0% of budgetALBEMARLE ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $1,975,538 over 9y, 10% of budgetALL MY CHILDREN FAMILY RESOURCE CTR: $783,191 over 6y, 17% of budgetFIRST PRESBYTERIAN DAY SCHOOL: $716,682 over 9y, 19% of budgetDURHAM'S PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN: $469,138 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetEARLY YEARS INC: $437,846 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetRANDOLPH COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC: $404,073 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetWORK FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC DBA CHILD CARE RESOURCE CENTER: $376,810 over 4y, 13% of budgetVictory Village Day Care Center Inc: $162,013 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetChapel Hill Cooperative Preschool: $100,460 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetChapel Hill Day Care Center Inc: $94,461 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetCHILDCARE MATTERS INC: $84,446 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetMI ESCUELITA INC: $56,381 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetTotsland Preschool: $49,607 over 1y, 30% of budgetTEXAS ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN: $45,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetNevada Association for the Education of Young Children: $37,500 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetDISPUTE SETTLEMENT CENTER INC: $26,635 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetDELAWARE ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION O: $25,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN CHILD DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARTIN PITT PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD CARE RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES RISING INC ↗
  • Who funds DOWN EAST PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds ALBEMARLE ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ALL MY CHILDREN FAMILY RESOURCE CTR ↗
  • Who funds FIRST PRESBYTERIAN DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds DURHAM'S PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds EARLY YEARS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

Durham's Partnership for ChildrenNC42.7× affinity18 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Durham's Partnership for Children · Orange County Partnership for Young Children · Wake County Smart Start Inc · Chatham County Partnership for Children · North Carolina Partnership for Children Inc · Early Learning Coalition of Broward County Inc · Indiana Association for the Education of Young Children Inc · Smart Start of Forsyth County · Z Smith Reynolds Foundation Inc · Select Cobb Inc · Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc · Hillsborough County School Readiness Coalition Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Early Years Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Early Years Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 246 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Early Years’ filings →

    More from the funding graph