Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dwight M Beeson Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$521k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$130k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.7MPhilanthropy$766kCrime & Legal$644kHuman Services$512kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$130,333
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER BIRM$130,333
BOYS AND GIRLS RANCHES OF ALABAMA$130,333
UNITED ABILITY INC$130,333
BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION INC$130,333
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%UNITED ABILITY INC: $142k → 16%ALABAMA SHERIFF'S BOYS AND GIRLS RANCHES: $142k → 18%BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $142k → 23%UNITED ABILITY INC: $133k → 16%ALABAMA SHERIFF'S BOYS AND GIRLS RANCHES: $126k → 18%BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $133k → 23%UNITED ABILITY INC: $130k → 16%ALABAMA SHERIFF'S BOYS AND GIRLS RANCHES: $125k → 18%BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $130k → 23%UNITED ABILITY INC: $128k → 16%ALABAMA SHERIFF'S BOYS AND GIRLS RANCHES: $123k → 18%BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $126k → 23%UNITED ABILITY INC: $126k → 16%BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $126k → 23%UNITED ABILITY INC: $126k → 16%BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $123k → 23%UNITED ABILITY INC: $125k → 16%UNITED ABILITY INC: $123k → 16%UNITED ABILITY INC: $123k → 16%THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER BIRM: $133k → 16%THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER BIRM: $130k → 16%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF: $128k → 16%THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER BIRM: $126k → 16%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BIRMINGHAM: $125k → 16%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER BIRMINGH: $142k → 16%THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER BIRM: $123k → 16%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER BIRMINGH: $126k → 16%MAYNARD COOPER GALE: $6k → 16%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER BIRMINGH: $123k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.2M · 8 repeat orgs$387k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
4

Total granted

$4.2M
$387k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UA
    UNITED ABILITY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +47%
  • BH
    BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $780k · revenue +64%
  • AS
    ALABAMA SHERIFFS' YOUTH RANCHES INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $512k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF
    one grant, 2017 · $128k
  • AS
    ALABAMA SHERIFF'S BOYS AND GIRLS CO N
    one grant, 2017 · $128k
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BIRMINGHAM
    one grant, 2018 · $125k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
4/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED ABILITY INC: $1,156,694 · HealthUNITED ABILITY INCBAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $780,154 · HealthBAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION INCBAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $199,770 · HealthBAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION INCALABAMA SHERIFF'S BOYS AND GIRLS RANCHES: $516,506 · OtherALABAMA SHERIFF'S BOYS AND GIRLS RANCHESTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER BIRM: $512,438 · OtherTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER BIRMCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER BIRMINGH: $391,150 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER BIRMINGHBAPTIST HOSPITALS FDN OF B'HAM: $176,770 · OtherBAPTIST HOSPITALS FDN OF B'HAMCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF: $127,750 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OFALABAMA SHERIFF'S BOYS AND GIRLS CO N: $127,750 · OtherALABAMA SHERIFF'S BOYS AND GIRLS CO NCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BIRMINGHAM: $125,357 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BIRMINGHAM+1 more: $6,204 · OtherALABAMA SHERIFFS' YOUTH RANCHES INC: $512,438 · Human ServicesALABAMA SHER…
Health$2,136,618Other$1,983,925Human Services$512,438

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED ABILITY INC: $1,156,694 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetBAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $780,154 over 6y, 11% of budgetALABAMA SHERIFFS' YOUTH RANCHES INC: $512,438 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetBAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $199,770 over 2y, 4.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED ABILITY INC ↗
  • Who funds BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALABAMA SHERIFFS' YOUTH RANCHES INC ↗
  • Who funds BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Lucille S Beeson Char Tr Bond MgmtAL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lucille S Beeson Char Tr Bond Mgmt

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dwight M Beeson Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dwight M Beeson Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dwight M Beeson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph