· Public charity
Duplin County Partnership for Children
The Duplin County Partnership for Children is a catalyst for the development, expansion, and promotion of positive quality opportunities for all children ages 0-12 and their families.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 18 grants below total $587,726 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $634,372 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $46,646 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $64k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $92k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $432k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Duplin County Board of Education | $196,866 |
| Kaplan Early Learning Company | $86,598 |
| Lou Annas Child Care Centers Inc | $77,706 |
| Precious Moments | $70,997 |
| Sandcastles Childcare Center | $22,952 |
| Tailored Learning Center II | $17,618 |
| Lyndas Play and Learn Too Inc | $16,427 |
| The Right Start Family Solution | $12,196 |
| Wee Are the World | $12,113 |
| Mt Olive Kiddie Kollege Incorporated | $10,747 |
| Kidz R Us | $9,747 |
| Green Acres Academy | $9,094 |
| Little Rainbows | $9,088 |
| TAILORED LEARNING CENTER TOO | $8,709 |
| Tailored Learning Center 1 | $8,369 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
21 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $128k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DCDuplin County Board of Education9× · 2017–2025 · $1.8M
- LALou Annas Child Care Ctr Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $592k
- PMPrecious Moments9× · 2017–2025 · $445k
Funded once
- CKClassy Kidz Child Care Center Incone grant, 2020 · $11k
- TLTHE LEARNING EXPERIENCEone grant, 2021 · $10k
- WCWee Care Education Academyone grant, 2021 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.