Skip to content

· Private foundation

Duane and Kathleen Foulkes Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$555k
Granted FY2024still arriving
61
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$1.0MEducation$423kReligion$330kHuman Services$235kRecreation & Sports$143kArts & Culture$140kEnvironment$131kPublic Benefit$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 61 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k42 grants · $80k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $423k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOND DU LAC AREA FDNBEAVER DAM AREA COMMUNITY FDN (NON-CASH MSFT 115 SH)$52,029
HOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION INC$49,500
ST STEPHEN'S LUTHERAN CHURCH - BEAVER DAM (NON-CASH MSFT 110 SH)$46,757
ST STEPHEN'S LUTHERAN CHURCH - BEAVER DAM (NON-CASH MSFT 100 SH)$42,506
FOND DU LAC AREA FDNBEAVER DAM AREA COMMUNITY FDN (NON-CASH MSFT 70 SH)$31,670
MAYO CLINIC (NON CASH COST 32 SH)$31,194
CITY OF BEAVER DAM$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$25,000
ST STEPHEN'S LUTHERAN CHURCH - BEAVER DAM$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$20,000
BEAVER DAM AREA COMMUNITY THEATRE INC$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
FOND DU LAC AREA FDNBEAVER DAM AREA COMMUNITY FDN (NON-CASH TJX 133 SH)$16,484
MAYO CLINIC (NON CASH TJX 100 SH)$12,274
ST STEPHEN'S LUTHERAN CHURCH - BEAVER DAM (NON CASH AAPL 67 SH)$11,414
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $74k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $3k → 10%WORLD ORPHAN FUND INC: $750 → 8%WORLD ORPHAN FUND INC: $500 → 8%WORLD ORPHAN FUND INC: $500 → 8%WORLD ORPHAN FUND INC: $500 → 8%WORLD ORPHAN FUND INC: $500 → 8%WORLD ORPHAN FUND INC: $500 → 8%YMCA OF DODGE COUNTY INC: $10k → 9%CLOTHES FOR KIDS INC: $5k → 9%CLOTHES FOR KIDS INC: $5k → 9%CLOTHES FOR KIDS INC: $5k → 9%CLOTHES FOR KIDS INC: $5k → 9%YMCA OF DODGE COUNTY INC: $5k → 9%CLOTHES FOR KIDS INC: $5k → 9%CLOTHES FOR KIDS INC: $5k → 9%PAVE - PEOPLE AGAINST A VIOLENT ENVIRONMENT: $4k → 9%YMCA OF DODGE COUNTY INC: $3k → 9%PAVE - PEOPLE AGAINST A VIOLENT ENVIRONMENT INCORPORATION: $3k → 9%YMCA OF DODGE COUNTY INC: $3k → 9%YMCA OF DODGE COUNTY INC: $3k → 9%YMCA OF DODGE COUNTY INC: $3k → 9%PAVE - PEOPLE AGAINST A VIOLENT ENVIRONMENT INCORPORATION: $3k → 9%BEAVERLAND MUST-SKIS: $2k → 9%PAVE - PEOPLE AGAINST A VIOLENT ENVIRONMENT INCORPORATION: $1k → 9%PAVE - PEOPLE AGAINST A VIOLENT ENVIRONMENT INCORPORATION: $1k → 9%YMCA OF DODGE COUNTY INC: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
OH
CA
CO
MD
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 48 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

48 repeat relationships: 40 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
59

Total granted

$1.0M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+5%

Still filing today

50%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $280k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $264k · revenue +21%
  • HY
    HOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $203k · revenue +22%
  • CH
    CHURCH HEALTH SERVICES INC
    4× · 2019–2024 · $52k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • MC
    MAYO CLINIC (NON-CASH 4158 SHARES FUNFX)
    one grant, 2020 · $286k
  • PP
    PAVE - PEOPLE AGAINST A VIOLENT ENVIRONMENT INCORPORATION (NON CASH 1700 SH
    one grant, 2022 · $102k
  • CH
    CHURCH HEALTH SERVICES INC (NON-CASH 1700 SHARES FUNFX)
    one grant, 2022 · $102k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

—
2
Door County Land Trust Inc

The door county land trust is a local, non-governmental non-profit organization whose mission is to preserve door county's exceptional lands and waters forever.

Environment
3
Lad Lake Inc

The mission of lad lake, inc. is to guide the growth of at-risk youth so that they reach their potential and live responsibly.

—
4
Beaver Dam Community Hospitals Inc

We enrich lives to create healthy communities through accessible, affordable, compassionate health care.

Health
5
Dane County Humane Society

Our mission is to foster compassionate human and animal connections; forge safe, healthy, and thriving communities for animals; provide care and transitional sheltering to animals; provide leadership and guidance to the animal sheltering…

Animals
6
Wisconsin Association of Lakes Inc

The mission of the wisconsin association of lakes is to conserve, enhance, and restore wisconsin's 15,000 lakes to ensure their sustainability for the benefit and collective use and enjoyment for this and future generations.

Environment
7
Beaver Dam Winter Sports Club Inc

To provide hockey and skating programs to our membership in a private club setting.

—
8
Oshkosh Convention & Visitors Bureau Inc

To promote oshkosh and winnebago county a premier destination for corporate, sports, and leisure groups and individual visitors.

—
9
Northwoods Inc of Wisconsin

Service for disabled adults

Human Services
10
Humane Animal Welfare Society of Waukesha County Inc

The humane animal welfare society of waukesha county leads the community in animal welfare and assures sanctuary for animals in need.

Animals
11
Our Lady of Hope Clinic Inc

Our lady of hope clinic is a direct primary care clinic that gives at least 55% of its services to the uninsured at no cost, consistent with the catholic health care tradition.

Health
12
Wisconsin Badger Camp Inc

The mission of wisconsin badger camp is to serve people with developmental disabilities by providing quality outdoor recreational experiences.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Wisconsin Inc; the most unlike its peers is Movember Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 125 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/42
Grantees still filing
28/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAYO CLINIC (NON-CASH 4158 SHARES FUNFX): $285,946 · OtherMAYO CLINIC (NON-CASH 4158 SHARES FUNFX)PAVE - PEOPLE AGAINST A VIOLENT ENVIRONMENT INCORPORATION (NON CASH 1700 SH: $101,864 · OtherPAVE - PEOPLE AGAINST A VIOLENT ENVIRONMENT INCORPORATION (NON CASH 1700 SHCHURCH HEALTH SERVICES INC (NON-CASH 1700 SHARES FUNFX): $101,864 · OtherCHURCH HEALTH SERVICES INC (NON-CASH 1700 SHARES FUNFX)MAYO CLINIC (NON CASH 522 SHARES AAPL): $100,934 · OtherMAYO CLINIC (NON CASH 522 SHARES AAPL)HOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION INC (NON-CASH 1032 SHARES FUNFX STOCK): $66,832 · OtherMAYO CLINIC (NON-CASH BCSIX STOCK): $65,561 · Other+97 more: $1,105,384 · Other+97 moreUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $264,144 · EducationUNIVERSITY …+2 more: $9,000 · EducationHOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION INC: $203,225 · PhilanthropyHOWARD YO…BEAVER DAM SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $15,855 · PhilanthropyBEAVER DA…+1 more: $1,022 · PhilanthropyBEAVER DAM AREA COMMUNITY THEATRE INC: $55,518 · Arts & CultureCAMPANILE CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $19,000 · Arts & CultureHERITAGE CAMPS FOR ADOPTIVE FAMILIES INC: $8,550 · Arts & CultureNORTH LAKELAND DISCOVERY CENTER INC: $4,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $2,200 · Arts & CultureCLOTHES FOR KIDS INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF DODGE COUNTY INC: $26,000 · Human ServicesPEOPLE AGAINST A VIOLENT ENVIRONMENT IN: $10,500 · Human ServicesMAMA'S HOUSE MINISTRIES FKA HEARTBEAT AT 22: $7,500 · Human ServicesThe World Orphan Fund Inc: $3,250 · Human Services+2 more: $4,500 · Human ServicesCHURCH HEALTH SERVICES INC: $51,700 · ReligionBEAVER DAM LAKE IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $22,500 · EnvironmentNORTHWOODS WILDLIFE CENTER: $14,500 · Environment
Other$1,828,385Education$273,144Philanthropy$220,102Arts & Culture$89,768Human Services$81,750Religion$51,700Environment$37,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $264,144 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION INC: $203,225 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetBEAVER DAM AREA COMMUNITY THEATRE INC: $55,518 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetCHURCH HEALTH SERVICES INC: $51,700 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetCLOTHES FOR KIDS INC: $30,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetYMCA OF DODGE COUNTY INC: $26,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetBEAVER DAM LAKE IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $22,500 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetCAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC: $20,953 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCAMPANILE CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $19,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetBEAVER DAM COMMUNITY HOSPITALS FOUNDATION INC: $16,500 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetBEAVER DAM SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $15,855 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetNORTHWOODS WILDLIFE CENTER: $14,500 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetPEOPLE AGAINST A VIOLENT ENVIRONMENT IN: $10,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHERITAGE CAMPS FOR ADOPTIVE FAMILIES INC: $8,550 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetDodge County Humane Society Inc: $8,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetMAMA'S HOUSE MINISTRIES FKA HEARTBEAT AT 22: $7,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMINOCQUA KAWAGUESAGA LAKES PROTECTION ASSOCIATION INC: $6,820 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetBEAVER DAM HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $6,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetKathy's House Inc: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGREEN VALLEY ENTERPRISES INC OF BEAVER DAM: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEAVER DAM YOUTH SPORTS ACTIVITIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 66% of budgetNORTH LAKELAND DISCOVERY CENTER INC: $4,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTEMPLE GRANDIN SCHOOL: $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe World Orphan Fund Inc: $3,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $3,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF DODGE COUNTY INC: $3,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetDOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSavanna Oaks Community Center Inc: $1,200 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,022 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF VILAS COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetWBEVWXRO CHILDREN'S RADIOTHON INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMOVEMBER FOUNDATION: $513 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Lima Community Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWISCONSIN BADGER STATE SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDWEST ATHLETES AGAINST CHILDHOOD CANCER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE ORPHANS ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS WISCONSIN INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BEAVER DAM AREA COMMUNITY THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CLOTHES FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF DODGE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds BEAVER DAM LAKE IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMPANILE CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds BEAVER DAM COMMUNITY HOSPITALS FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Peter J Seippel Foundation IncWI34.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Peter J Seippel Foundation Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · The Jack and Arlene Schumann Foundation Inc · Nelson & Vera Hicks Charitable Fdn · Beaver Dam Community Hospitals Foundation Inc · Pukall Lumber Foundation Inc · Keller Family Charitable Trust · United Way of Dodge County Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Lumw Foundation · Michels Family Foundation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Duane and Kathleen Foulkes Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Duane and Kathleen Foulkes Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 125 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Duane and Kathleen Foulkes’ filings →

    More from the funding graph