Skip to content
Dt1 Charities at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Dt1 Charities

TO PROMOTE AWARENESS AND EDUCATION ABOUT TYPE 1 DIABETES, PROVIDE ASSISTANCE TO INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIES OF INDIVIDUALS DIAGNOSED WITH TYPE 1 DIABETES, AND SUPPORT TYPE 1 DIABETES RESEARCH.

$120k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$455kScience & Tech$375kFood & Nutrition$50kInternational$25kEducation$20kCivil Rights$10kRecreation & Sports$2kCommunity Improvement$1k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$923k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLLEGE DIABETES NETWORK$100,000
A BETTER CHANCE IN LOWER MERION$10,000
OUR AMERICAN FUTURE FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE: $25k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$820k · 4 repeat orgs$119k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$820k
$99k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+52%

Still filing today

75%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    COLLEGE DIABETES NETWORK INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $375k · revenue +33%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
    2× · 2021–2022 · $40k · revenue +45%
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1D
    3× · 2017–2020 · $30k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • CK
    Cathedral Kitchen of Camden County
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • GH
    Global Humanitarian Assistance Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -22% · 30% of their budget
  • SC
    STEVE'S CLUB
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
4
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
5
Children's Health Care Associates Inc

To provide medical and speciality care for patients and educational, research and administrative services to the children's hospital of philadelphia and the university of pennsylvania school of medicine.

—
6
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh Foundation

Children's hospital of pittsburgh foundation is the sole fundraising arm of upmc children's hospital of pittsburgh.the foundation exists to provide financial support for the hospital's mission of improving the health and well-being of…

Health
7
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
8
Children's Anesthesiology Associates Ltd

To provide anesthesia and critical care for patients and educational, research and administrative services to the children's hospital of philadelphia and the university of pennsylvania school of medicine.

Health
9
Philadelphia Convention & Visitors Bureau

The philadelphia convention & visitors bureau (phlcvb) is the official tourism promotion agency for the city of philadelphia globally, and the sales and marketing agency for the pennsylvania convention center (pcc). phlcvb markets…

—
10
Children's Heartlink

We save children's lives by transforming pediatric heart care in underserved parts of the world.

—
11
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
12
Children's Surgical Associates Ltd

To provide medical and surgical care for patients and educational research and administrative services to the children's hospital of philadelphia and the university of pennsylvania school of medicine.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Global Humanitarian Assistance Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLLEGE DIABETES NETWORK INC: $375,000 · HealthCOLLEGE DIABETES NETWORK INCTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $40,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIABREAKTHROUGH T1D: $30,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D+1 more: $10,000 · HealthJDRF - South Jersey Chapter: $375,000 · OtherJDRF - South Jersey ChapterCathedral Kitchen of Camden County: $50,000 · OtherCathedral Kitchen of Camden County+2 more: $20,000 · OtherGlobal Humanitarian Assistance Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesOUR AMERICAN FUTURE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Civil RightsSOUTH JERSEY TITANS: $2,400 · Recreation & SportsHADDON TOWNSHIP EQUITY INITIATIVE: $1,250 · Community Improvement
Health$455,000Other$445,000Human Services$25,000Civil Rights$10,000Recreation & Sports$2,400Community Improvement$1,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLLEGE DIABETES NETWORK INC: $375,000 over 4y, 7.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGlobal Humanitarian Assistance Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetOUR AMERICAN FUTURE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA BETTER CHANCE IN LOWER MERION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSOUTH JERSEY TITANS: $2,400 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHADDON TOWNSHIP EQUITY INITIATIVE: $1,250 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dt1 Charities funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dt1 Charities. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dt1 Charities?

    Find your warmest path to Dt1 Charities through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dt1 Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home