Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dsds Lew Family Foundation Inc

$79k
Granted FY2021
5
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Education$47kArts & Culture$23kCommunity Improvement$19kAnimals$18kPhilanthropy$500Human Services$500Health$100
02FY2021 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k2 grants · $1k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $78k
$18,016
Median grant
2
States reached
$4k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UCSD FOUNDATION$41,717
HELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER$18,017
PACIFIC ARTS MOVEMENT$18,016
CHINESE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION INC$500
BOWDOIN COLLEGE$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNION OF PAN ASIAN COMMUNITIES: $10k → 11%UNION OF PAN ASIAN COMMUNITIES: $2k → 11%UNION OF PAN ASIAN COMMUNITIES: $2k → 11%UNION OF PAN ASIAN COMMUNITIES: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$71k · 5 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +94% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2021, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$71k
$600

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+94%
-1%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Arts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyAnimalsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • US
    UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2021 · $47k · revenue +106%
  • UO
    UNION OF PAN ASIAN COMMUNITIES
    4× · 2017–2020 · $15k · revenue +94%
  • AB
    ASIAN BUSINESS ASSOCIATION SAN DIEGO
    2× · 2017–2018 · $5k · revenue +297%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SHILLMAN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $500 · revenue -1%
  • AA
    Alzheimer Association
    one grant, 2020 · $100

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uc Chinese Alumni Foundation
2
San Diego Chinese Historical Society and Museum

Preservation of the history and heritage of Chinese-Americans in San Diego and the education of people in Chinese-American history. Special exhibits & lectures occur in addition to permanent exhibits.

Arts & Culture
3
Asian American Advocacy Alliance
Community Improvement
4
Center for Advanced China Research
5
Japantown Cultural Society
Education
6
Shanghai Jiao Tong University Foundation of America (Sjtufa)
Education
7
San Francisco Guzheng Music Society
Arts & Culture
8
California Institute of Contemporary Art
9
San Diego Falun Dafa Association

The mission is to promote and advertise public awareness of chinese culture by perferming shen yun shows. in addition, falun dafa are taught free of charge.

Human Services
10
Taiwanese-American Foundation of San Diego

To engage in chratable educational and community activities that promote culture and tradition in the community, and promote the health and social well-being of the communities.

Arts & Culture
11
The Asia Society

The society is an international nonprofit, nonpartisan organization which connects people and institutions in asia and the world to build understanding, address challenges and maximize opportunities.

International
12
San Diego Double Ten Committee
Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Uc San Diego Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Shillman Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $46,717 · EducationUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION+1 more — $500 · EducationPACIFIC ARTS MOVEMENT — $18,016 · Arts & CulturePACIFIC ARTS MOVEMENTSAN DIEGO-YANTAI FRIENDSHIP SOCIETY — $4,050 · Arts & CultureSAN DIEGO-YANTAI FRIEND…CHINESE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA — $850 · Arts & CultureHELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER — $18,017 · AnimalsHELEN WOODWARD ANI…UNION OF PAN ASIAN COMMUNITIES — $14,700 · Human ServicesUNION OF PAN AS…ASIAN BUSINESS ASSOCIATION SAN DIEGO — $4,700 · OtherCHINESE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION INC — $500 · Other+1 more — $100 · OtherTHE SHILLMAN FOUNDATION — $500 · Philanthropy
Education$47,217Arts & Culture$22,916Animals$18,017Human Services$14,700Other$5,300Philanthropy$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $46,717 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER — $18,017 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPACIFIC ARTS MOVEMENT — $18,016 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetUNION OF PAN ASIAN COMMUNITIES — $14,700 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetASIAN BUSINESS ASSOCIATION SAN DIEGO — $4,700 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetSAN DIEGO-YANTAI FRIENDSHIP SOCIETY — $4,050 over 3y, 27% of budgetCHINESE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA — $850 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SHILLMAN FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBowdoin College — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dsds Lew Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dsds Lew Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Dsds Lew Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph