Skip to content
Dream Work Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Dream Work Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$49k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

International$134kHealth$84kRecreation & Sports$20kHousing & Shelter$9kHuman Services$5kAnimals$1kReligion$1kMembership Benefit$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $49k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$49,192
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$1,750
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,200
Individual grant recipient$1,117
Individual grant recipient$1,000
AMERICAN LEGION POST 148$1,000
Individual grant recipient$750
Individual grant recipient$500
YOU FEED THEM MFP$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$375
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 90% of grant dollars ($231k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 10% that went abroad ($27k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 51% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%NAIMA SHEEKH AHMED: $5k → 11%TRADE2AID: $10k → 14%WATAN USA: $50k → 14%TENDRA DUFF: $500 → 5%JOCELYN GARNER: $1k → 5%SARA VINSON: $1k → 8%ERNEST MURRAY: $2k → 9%AMERICAN LEGION POST 148: $1k → 12%CHELSEA FIELDS: $500 → 12%NEELY RICHER: $1k → 13%DENISE GONZALES: $1k → 13%RODELL ZONE: $500 → 15%JENNIFER DILLMAN: $1k → 15%DOMANIC GRAYNED: $500 → 16%MORGAN PHILLIPS: $2k → 18%MELVIN MOON: $1k → 19%TESSA HAMM WELTON: $1k → 19%OBAT HELPERS USA: $3k → 6%VIRGEN SULUAGA: $500 → 5%SORRELL HAWKINS: $1k → 15%ROBERT LOVE: $5k → 16%MIRACLE LEAGUE OF WESTFIELD: $20k → 5%DURRA WHITACRE: $2k → 15%ROBERT LOVE: $1k → 16%CONFIDENTIAL - INDIVIDUAL RECIPIENTS: $49k → 5%SHAHEIN BARRETT: $3k → 16%KELLY P ITMAN: $750 → 16%YOU FEED THEM MFP: $500 → 16%SONIA MARSICH: $375 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 10% of all-years giving ($27k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Turkey$27k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
0/1
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $49,192 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $22,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $22,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMIRACLE LEAGUE OF WESTFIELD: $20,000 · OtherMIRACLE LEAGUE OF WESTFIELDIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $18,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTRADE2AID: $10,000 · Other+27 more: $42,587 · Other+27 moreOBAT HELPERS INC: $2,500 · International
Other$255,529International$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOBAT HELPERS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OBAT HELPERS INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dream Work Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dream Work Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dream Work’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home