Skip to content

· Private foundation

Drc Sannam Forum Inc

$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$23kHuman Services$12kHousing & Shelter$3kReligion$2kInternational$2kFood & Nutrition$2kHealth$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$4k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Sannam Scholarship Fund$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 22% of grant dollars ($11k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 78% that went abroad ($39k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Jesus Love House Mission: $500 → 13%Jesus Love House Mission: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 78% of all-years giving ($39k)

6 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Afghanistan$26k · 47 grants
South Korea$10k · 17 grants
New Zealand$1k · 1 grant
Mongolia$500 · 1 grant
Uzbekistan$500 · 1 grant
Guatemala$500 · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$29k · 19 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
42

Total granted

$29k
$21k

Still filing today

21%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    THE NANOOM HOUSE INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $1k · revenue +264%
  • JL
    JESUS LOVE HOUSE MISSION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $1k · revenue +69%
  • TH
    TEAM HEALTHCARE INCORPORATED
    2× · 2020–2021 · $1k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • TF
    The First Presbyterian Church of NJ
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Sannam Scholarship Fund: $4,250 · OtherSannam Scholarship FundHa Eun Church: $2,600 · OtherHa Eun ChurchSannam Presbyterian Church: $2,600 · OtherSannam Presbyterian ChurchIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,580 · OtherAll Nations Friendship Hospital: $1,500 · Other+51 more: $29,600 · Other+51 moreFairleigh Dickinson University: $3,000 · EducationTHE NANOOM HOUSE INC: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterJESUS LOVE HOUSE MISSION INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesTEAM HEALTHCARE INCORPORATED: $1,000 · Health
Other$44,130Education$3,000Housing & Shelter$1,000Human Services$1,000Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFairleigh Dickinson University: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NANOOM HOUSE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetJESUS LOVE HOUSE MISSION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTEAM HEALTHCARE INCORPORATED: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Fairleigh Dickinson University ↗
  • Who funds THE NANOOM HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds JESUS LOVE HOUSE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds TEAM HEALTHCARE INCORPORATED ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Drc Sannam Forum Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Drc Sannam Forum Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Fairleigh Dickinson University: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Drc Sannam Forum Inc?

Find your warmest path to Drc Sannam Forum Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Drc Sannam Forum’s filings →

More from the funding graph