Skip to content

· Public charity

Downtown Danville Association Dba River District Association

To ensure the long term viability of danville's river district as a center of business and civic life, and a source of community pride.

$165k
Granted FY2023
10
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Community Improvement$90kEmployment$23kArts & Culture$20kHuman Services$8k
02FY2023 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $120,037, the rows itemized in this filing. The $165,075 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $45,038 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k5 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $83k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$753k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE BRICK$26,653
COSMETIC ART STORE - PRO PRODUCT DISTRIBUTOR$21,759
BEST BUY AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT$14,000
URBAN FITNESS LLC$10,752
C&J WILSON PROPERTIES$10,000
Individual grant recipient$9,053
BLISS HAIR AND NAIL STUDIO$8,940
FREEDOM BREEDER$7,538
UNCLE AL'S$6,255
DUSTIN HABERER$5,087
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BEST BUY AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT: $14k → 11%FREEDOM BREEDER: $8k → 15%THE BRICK: $27k → 14%COSMETIC ART STORE - PRO PRODUCT DISTRIBUTOR: $22k → 14%FIREFLY STUDIOS LLC: $20k → 14%C&J WILSON PROPERTIES: $10k → 14%BUBBLE AQUATICS: $9k → 14%BLISS HAIR AND NAIL STUDIO: $9k → 14%UNCLE AL'S: $6k → 14%DUSTIN HABERER: $5k → 14%URBAN FITNESS LLC: $11k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2020–2023.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2020 to 2023, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BRICK: $26,653 · OtherTHE BRICKCOSMETIC ART STORE - PRO PRODUCT DISTRIBUTOR: $21,759 · OtherCOSMETIC ART STORE - PRO PRODUCT DISTRIBUTORFIREFLY STUDIOS LLC: $19,786 · OtherFIREFLY STUDIOS LLCBEST BUY AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT: $14,000 · OtherBEST BUY AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENTURBAN FITNESS LLC: $10,752 · OtherURBAN FITNESS LLCC&J WILSON PROPERTIES: $10,000 · OtherC&J WILSON PROPERTIESIndividual grant recipient: $9,053 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBLISS HAIR AND NAIL STUDIO: $8,940 · OtherBLISS HAIR AND NAIL STUDIOFREEDOM BREEDER: $7,538 · OtherFREEDOM BREEDERUNCLE AL'S: $6,255 · OtherDUSTIN HABERER: $5,087 · Other
Other$139,823

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Downtown Danville Association Dba River District Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph