Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dortone Esser Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$395k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$515kInternational$313kAnimals$272kEnvironment$246kHealth$157kHuman Services$140kEducation$90kScience & Tech$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $300k
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GIVE WELL$100,000
ANIMAL CHARITY EVALUATORS - RECOMMENDED CHARITY FUND$75,000
GIVING GREEN RESEARCH GROUP INC$75,000
GIVEDIRECTLY$50,000
DOCTOR WITHOUT BORDERS$40,000
CARE USA$35,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%OXFAM AMERICA: $10k → 16%RADNOR MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $13k → 6%FRANKLIN INSTITUTE BENEFACTOR SOCIETY: $25k → 22%ID INSIGHT - GIVING GREEN: $75k → 10%ANIMAL CHARITY EVALUATORS - RECOMMENDED CHARITY FUND: $75k → 14%DOCTOR WITHOUT BORDERS: $40k → 17%GIVE WELL: $125k → 20%CARE USA: $35k → 13%OXFAM AMERICA: $10k → 16%FRANKLIN INSTITUTE: $25k → 22%ID INSIGHT - GIVING GREEN: $65k → 10%ANIMAL CHARITY EVALUATORS - RECOMMENDED CHARITY FUND: $75k → 14%DOCTOR WITHOUT BORDERS: $35k → 17%GIVE WELL: $115k → 20%CARE USA: $25k → 13%OXFAM AMERICA: $10k → 16%FRANKLIN INSTITUTE BENEFACTOR SOCIETY: $25k → 22%ID INSIGHT - GIVING GREEN: $10k → 10%ANIMAL CHARITY EVALUATORS - RECOMMENDED CHARITY FUND: $75k → 14%DOCTOR WITHOUT BORDERS: $35k → 17%GIVE WELL: $100k → 20%CARE USA: $25k → 13%OXFAM AMERICA: $8k → 16%FRANKLIN INSTITUTE - ENDOWMENT FUND FOR COLLECTIONS CARE: $15k → 22%GIVING GREEN RESEARCH GROUP INC: $75k → 10%ANIMAL CHARITY EVALUATORS - RECOMMENDED CHARITY FUND: $25k → 14%DOCTOR WITHOUT BORDERS: $25k → 17%GIVE WELL: $50k → 20%CARE USA: $25k → 13%FRANKLIN INSTITUTE - CURRENT CURATORIAL FUND: $15k → 22%DOCTOR WITHOUT BORDERS: $10k → 17%GIVE WELL: $25k → 20%CARE USA: $25k → 13%FRANKLIN INSTITUTE - ENDOWMENT FUND FOR COLLECTIONS CARE: $15k → 22%DOCTOR WITHOUT BORDERS: $8k → 17%GIVE WELL: $25k → 20%CARE USA: $25k → 13%FRANKLIN INSTITUTE: $10k → 22%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $20k → 17%GIVE WELL: $25k → 20%CARE USA: $25k → 13%FRANKLIN INSTITUTE BENEFACTOR SOCIETY: $10k → 22%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $10k → 17%GIVE WELL: $25k → 20%CARE USA: $25k → 13%FRANKLIN INSTITUTE BENEFACTOR SOCIETY: $10k → 22%GIVE WELL: $25k → 20%CARE USA: $20k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 17 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
1

Total granted

$1.7M
$75k

Still filing today

53%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalArts & CultureEnvironmentAnimalsHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $230k · revenue +36%
  • GIVEDIRECTLY INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $140k · revenue +18%
  • OXFAM-AMERICA INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $53k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • GG
    Giving Green Research Group Inc
    one grant, 2025 · $75k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
3
Rainforest Alliance Holding Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

Environment
4
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
5
Rocky Mountain Institute

Transform the global energy system to secure a clean, prosperous, zero-carbon future for all.

—
6
Rights and Resources Institute Inc

Rri's mission is to support local communities and indigenous peoples' struggles against poverty and marginalization by promoting greater global commitment and action towards policy, market, and legal reforms that secure their rights to…

Environment
7
Guttmacher Institute Inc

The institute is a leading research and policy organization committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in the united states and globally.

—
8
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
9
Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment
10
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
11
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
12
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oxfam-America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Giving Green Research Group Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GIVE WELL: $515,000 · OtherGIVE WELLANIMAL CHARITY EVALUATORS - RECOMMENDED CHARITY FUND: $265,000 · OtherANIMAL CHARITY EVALUATORS - RECOMMENDED CHARITY FUNDDOCTOR WITHOUT BORDERS: $152,500 · OtherDOCTOR WITHOUT BORDERSID INSIGHT - GIVING GREEN: $150,000 · OtherID INSIGHT - GIVING GREENFRANKLIN INSTITUTE BENEFACTOR SOCIETY: $70,000 · OtherFRANKLIN INSTITUTE BENEFACTOR SOCIETY+3 more: $56,000 · OtherCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $230,000 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASS…OXFAM-AMERICA INC: $52,500 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INCInternational Rescue Committee INC: $30,000 · InternationalInternational Rescu…GIVEDIRECTLY INC: $140,000 · Human ServicesGiving Green Research Group Inc: $75,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $21,000 · EnvironmentTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE: $50,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY: $4,000 · Arts & CultureHumane World for Animals Inc: $7,000 · AnimalsTHE BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Health
Other$1,208,500International$312,500Human Services$140,000Environment$96,000Arts & Culture$54,000Animals$7,000Health$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $230,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $140,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $52,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE: $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dortone Esser Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dortone Esser Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dortone Esser’s filings →

More from the funding graph