Skip to content
Doochin Family Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Doochin Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$130k
Granted FY2026still arriving
37
Grants FY2026still arriving
11
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$437kEducation$251kPhilanthropy$247kHuman Services$50kArts & Culture$43kFood & Nutrition$22kEnvironment$20kHealth$14kOther$0
02FY2026 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k32 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $91k
$500
Median grant
11
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$30,860
CENTER FOR JEWISH AWARENESS$19,750
JEWISH FOUNDATION OF NASHVILLE$17,350
ABE'S GARDEN COMMUNITY$12,500
UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NASHVILLE$11,000
CONGREGATION MICAH$8,468
Individual grant recipient$7,500
THE TEMPLE CONGREGATION OHABAI SHOLOM$5,775
CONGREGATION BEIT TEFILAH CHABAD$2,800
Individual grant recipient$2,500
W END SYNAGOGUE RABBIS DISCRETIONARY FUND$1,925
FRIST ART MUSEUM$1,600
HADASSAH$1,000
JDC$1,000
KSPACE MIAMI$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICES: $1k → 15%CHILDREN'S HOUSE OF NASHVILLE: $600 → 14%CHILDRENS HOUSE OF NASHVILLE: $500 → 14%CHILDRENS HOUSE OF NASHVILLE: $500 → 14%CHILDREN'S HOUSE OF NASHVILLE: $500 → 14%CHILDRENS HOUSE OF NASHVILLE: $500 → 14%CHILDRENS HOUSE OF NASHVILLE: $350 → 14%CHILDRENS HOUSE OF NASHVILLE: $250 → 14%GORDON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $8k → 14%GORDON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 14%GORDON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 14%GORDON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $100 → 14%ALIVE HOSPICE: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
NJ
CA
MO
KY
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 80 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

80 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2026, 48 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

80
54

Total granted

$1.1M
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+23%

Still filing today

48%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesInternationalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • US
    UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NASHVILLE
    10× · 2017–2026 · $240k · revenue +37%
  • THE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $35k · revenue +14%
  • FRIST ART MUSEUM
    10× · 2017–2026 · $18k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SMITHSONIAN
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • TS
    THE SEMINAR NETWORK TRUST
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • RO
    ROOTS OF REFORM JUDAISM INC
    one grant, 2025 · $3k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
5
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
6
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
8
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
9
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
10
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
11
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
12
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Monarch Butterfly Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 144 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
60/63
Grantees still filing
53/63
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTER FOR JEWISH AWARENESS: $196,050 · OtherCENTER FOR JEWISH AWARENESSJEWISH FOUNDATION OF NASHVILLE: $136,600 · OtherJEWISH FOUNDATION OF NASHVILLECONGREGATION MICAH: $122,016 · OtherCONGREGATION MICAHTEMPLE CONGREGATION OHABAI SHOLOM: $102,205 · OtherTEMPLE CONGREGATION OHABAI SHOLOMJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $66,210 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES+97 more: $148,002 · Other+97 moreUNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NASHVILLE: $240,468 · EducationUNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NA…+8 more: $18,236 · Education+8 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF NASHVILLE AND MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $73,250 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FED…THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $40,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUN…FRIENDS OF CHABAD LUBAVITCH BOLIVIA: $4,160 · Philanthropy+1 more: $36 · PhilanthropyTHE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION: $35,000 · Environment+3 more: $825 · EnvironmentFRIST ART MUSEUM: $17,550 · Arts & CultureNashville Symphony Association: $6,000 · Arts & CultureTENNESSEE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER (TPAC) MANAGEMENT CORPORATION: $2,200 · Arts & CultureNASHVILLE BALLET: $1,350 · Arts & Culture+12 more: $6,215 · Arts & CultureJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NASHVILLE: $10,275 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS HOUSE OF NASHVILLE INC: $3,200 · Human ServicesALIVE HOSPICE INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICE: $1,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $8,360 · InternationalCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $2,250 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $1,650 · International+2 more: $448 · International
Other$771,083Education$258,704Philanthropy$117,446Environment$35,825Arts & Culture$33,315Human Services$16,475International$12,708

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NASHVILLE: $240,468 over 10y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF NASHVILLE AND MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $73,250 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetFRIST ART MUSEUM: $17,550 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NASHVILLE: $10,275 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $8,360 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWilliams College: $6,100 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNashville Symphony Association: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetStand Together: $5,650 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetVanderbilt University: $4,336 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF CHABAD LUBAVITCH BOLIVIA: $4,160 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $3,854 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS HOUSE OF NASHVILLE INC: $3,200 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetABE'S GARDEN: $3,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetROOTS OF REFORM JUDAISM INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $2,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $2,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTENNESSEE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER (TPAC) MANAGEMENT CORPORATION: $2,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALIVE HOSPICE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $1,800 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOWL'S HILL NATURE SANCTUARY: $1,690 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $1,650 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNASHVILLE BALLET: $1,350 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTENNGREEN LAND CONSERVANCY: $1,275 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBARNARD COLLEGE: $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNASHVILLE OPERA ASSOCIATION: $1,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $1,090 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $1,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $1,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Heimerdinger Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Jewish Professionals Miami Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNASHVILLE PUBLIC RADIO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ENSWORTH SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WARNER PARKS INC: $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYehudi Inc: $850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA: $700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $700 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMONARCH BUTTERFLY FUND: $600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIP HOUSE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFORWARD IN THE FIFTH INC: $325 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $322 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTENNIAL PARK CONSERVANCY: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NASHVILLE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF NASHVILLE AND MIDDLE TENNESSEE ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIST ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NASHVILLE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds Williams College ↗
  • Who funds Nashville Symphony Association ↗
  • Who funds Stand Together ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CHABAD LUBAVITCH BOLIVIA ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS HOUSE OF NASHVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds ABE'S GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds ROOTS OF REFORM JUDAISM INC ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds TENNESSEE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER (TPAC) MANAGEMENT CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Steven & Laurie E…The Community Foundat…Memorial Foundation I…The Joel C & Bernice …Hca Healthcare Founda…The Frist FoundationThe Blum Family Found…Dettwiller FoundationDorothy Cate and Thom…Eden FoundationThe Annette & Irwin E…The Danner Foundation
The Steven & Laurie Eskind Family FoundationTN36.6× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Steven & Laurie Eskind Family Foundation · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Memorial Foundation Inc · The Joel C & Bernice W Gordon Family Foundation · Hca Healthcare Foundation · The Frist Foundation · The Blum Family Foundation · Dettwiller Foundation · Dorothy Cate and Thomas F Frist Foundation · Eden Foundation · The Annette & Irwin Eskind Family Foundation · The Danner Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Doochin Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Doochin Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Yehudi Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Williams College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 144 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Doochin Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home